지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The system of weights and measure in the late Choseon dynasty can be summarized as follows: There were Whangjongcheok, Jucheok, Yeongjocheok, Joryegicheok, Pobaekcheok, and so forth in the late Choseon dynasty. These names had already appeared and had been widely used since the early Choseon dynasty. The measure in the early Choseon dynasty was in common use after the Japanese invasion in 1592, but had some problems in the long and the short of measure. To solve these problems the measure was adjusted to the standard of Samcheokbu's Pobaekcheok corrected in 1446 and 1740. These problems were not easily solved after then. The length of measure in the late Choseon dynasty was linked with socio-economic conditions. Jucheok was used for Yangjeon, Yeongjocheok for architecture, and Pobaekcheok for the collections of Po. Yeongjocheok and Jucheok weren't directly related with collection of Po, with the result that these were a bit more reduced in the
late Choseon dynasty than in the early; Pobaekcheok directly related with collection of Po, it became larger in the late Choseon dynasty, as we can see through analyzing the length of actual objects and drawings. We can understand this by the length of measure investigated in the period of opening the ports by imperialist Japan. The the system of quantity bowls, that is, Gok, Du, Seung and Hap was changed in the late Choseon dynasty. Hap had had an important function in the system of quantity in the early Choseon dynasty, but Sokdaejeon and Daejeonhoetong did not write down the bulk of Hap. This is because the government did not recognize that Hap was important as bulk. It result from the development of commercial monetary economy according to the increase of productivity by developing agricultural technology. As a result, Seung was used as a quantity bowl in the early Choseon dynasty, but Du in the late. The bulk of quantity bowl was increasing in the late Choseon dynasty. Central government regulated the bulk of quantity bowl strongly, but the bulk of quantity bowl made privately increased more. The bulk of Seung did not serve as fundamental quantity bowl of barter properly. People used quantity bowls twice or three times as much as established bowls. This was true of Du, but the degree of increase of its bulk was not greater than Seung. It was because Du was made an important unit of barter. Though the bulk of quantity bowl was increasing, it was uniform more or less centering on local important position. This meant that it had something to do with commercial power centering around important region.
late Choseon dynasty than in the early; Pobaekcheok directly related with collection of Po, it became larger in the late Choseon dynasty, as we can see through analyzing the length of actual objects and drawings. We can understand this by the length of measure investigated in the period of opening the ports by imperialist Japan. The the system of quantity bowls, that is, Gok, Du, Seung and Hap was changed in the late Choseon dynasty. Hap had had an important function in the system of quantity in the early Choseon dynasty, but Sokdaejeon and Daejeonhoetong did not write down the bulk of Hap. This is because the government did not recognize that Hap was important as bulk. It result from the development of commercial monetary economy according to the increase of productivity by developing agricultural technology. As a result, Seung was used as a quantity bowl in the early Choseon dynasty, but Du in the late. The bulk of quantity bowl was increasing in the late Choseon dynasty. Central government regulated the bulk of quantity bowl strongly, but the bulk of quantity bowl made privately increased more. The bulk of Seung did not serve as fundamental quantity bowl of barter properly. People used quantity bowls twice or three times as much as established bowls. This was true of Du, but the degree of increase of its bulk was not greater than Seung. It was because Du was made an important unit of barter. Though the bulk of quantity bowl was increasing, it was uniform more or less centering on local important position. This meant that it had something to do with commercial power centering around important region.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 척의 종류와 길이
Ⅲ. 量의 운용과 변화
Ⅳ. 맺 음 말
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
조선후기사의 연구 경향
역사학보
2008 .09
-
조선후기사의 연구경향
역사학보
2007 .09
-
조선시대와 일제시대 여성의 법적 지위 비교
역사와 담론
2003 .12
-
[조선 후기] 2008년 조선후기사 연구 경향과 전망
역사학보
2009 .09
-
해방 직후 재일한인 문단과 ‘일본어’ 창작문제 - 朝鮮文藝를 중심으로
한국문학논총
2006 .01
-
조선시대 금석학 연구의 실태
국학연구
2002 .12
-
개항기 일본어민의 조선어장 침탈과 러·일간의 각축
대구사학
2011 .01
-
朝鲜王朝前期韩国朱子学的特点
철학연구
2016 .12
-
‘단어결합’에 대한 이북, 중국 재외 동포, 이남 조선어(국어)학 기술의 사적 탐색
국어국문학
2020 .09
-
다카하마 교시의 『조선』 론* ─교정되는 텍스트를 중심으로─
日本學硏究
2016 .01
-
朝鮮初期 說話文學의 硏究
성곡논총
1985 .06
-
식민지시기 親族慣習의 創出과 日本民法
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2005 .09
-
1920년대 일본아동문예잡지 『긴노후네』와 조선동화
아동청소년문학연구
2018 .06
-
식민지기 새로운 지식체계로서 ‘조선사’‧‘조선문학’‧‘동양철학’의 형성과 고등교육
동방학지
2012 .01
-
1910년대 총독부의 조선 문화재 조사 사업에 관하여
역사와경계
2008 .12
-
조선후기 刀劒 素材 科擧 答案사례에 대한 一考察 -｢劒策問｣과 ｢劒對策文｣을 중심으로-
동방한문학
2020 .01
-
아사카와 타쿠미(淺川 巧)의 삶의 궤적과 '朝鮮' - 日記와 隨想을 중심으로
세계문학비교연구
2006 .01
-
조선조의 죽음의례 정책
종교문화연구
2006 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-014462838