지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Nowadays, We can see some trials that adopt the historical perspective based on the post-modernism to the understanding and teaching of Korean history. They have criticized the ruling research trend as a out-of-dated style or a meaningless contents. I think we should listen to these criticism respectfully. But same time, I think those trials are not appropriate for Korean history.
The postmodernism wag originated in the tendency against the national design and control. In May 1968, France experienced a political and social upheaval that shook the regime to its foundations. Student unrest in the late 60's was a world-wide phenomenon, fuelled by American protests against U.S. involvement in Vietnam and by sympathy for Latin American revolutionaries such as Fidel Castro and Che Guevarra. In this social atmosphere, the postmodernism rose and became influential. As a result, the postmodernist lays emphasis upon the sovereign autonomous individual, and rejects the nationalㆍrational center-minded ideas. But this postmodern tendency, against its will, has contributed to widen the 'new economy' which threw the outside world of U.S. and Europe into poverty. So I think, in Korea, the postmodern historical perspective should reestimate the role of nation that the last one can resist the world capitalism.
Most historian of Korea have pursued the historical theme basing on so-called 'nationalism'. And there have been many critiques to this tendency. But I could see some paralogisms in those critiques. First, that was not the nationalism but the pseudo-nationalism. Second, what most historian of Korea pursued was the traditional thinking and method of historical understanding which has been succeeded from ancient society. We Korean could have maintained our sovereignity and cultural originality by this traditional understanding of history. Traditionally we have a historical viewpoint taking seriously other's specialty and variety, so put its emphasis on the peaceful coexistence as well as our nation's prosperity. I think it is a valuable subject that we should reform and develop the traditional historical perspective to the postmodern age's view.
The postmodernism wag originated in the tendency against the national design and control. In May 1968, France experienced a political and social upheaval that shook the regime to its foundations. Student unrest in the late 60's was a world-wide phenomenon, fuelled by American protests against U.S. involvement in Vietnam and by sympathy for Latin American revolutionaries such as Fidel Castro and Che Guevarra. In this social atmosphere, the postmodernism rose and became influential. As a result, the postmodernist lays emphasis upon the sovereign autonomous individual, and rejects the nationalㆍrational center-minded ideas. But this postmodern tendency, against its will, has contributed to widen the 'new economy' which threw the outside world of U.S. and Europe into poverty. So I think, in Korea, the postmodern historical perspective should reestimate the role of nation that the last one can resist the world capitalism.
Most historian of Korea have pursued the historical theme basing on so-called 'nationalism'. And there have been many critiques to this tendency. But I could see some paralogisms in those critiques. First, that was not the nationalism but the pseudo-nationalism. Second, what most historian of Korea pursued was the traditional thinking and method of historical understanding which has been succeeded from ancient society. We Korean could have maintained our sovereignity and cultural originality by this traditional understanding of history. Traditionally we have a historical viewpoint taking seriously other's specialty and variety, so put its emphasis on the peaceful coexistence as well as our nation's prosperity. I think it is a valuable subject that we should reform and develop the traditional historical perspective to the postmodern age's view.
목차
1. 序言
2. 포스트모더니즘의 擡頭와 近代歷史學에 대한 懷疑
3. 포스트모더니즘적 韓國史 理解의 問題點
4. 國史敎育의 本質에 대한 誤解와 그 展開의 問題點
5. 結語
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
역사교육에서 민족주의를 둘러싼 최근 논의 : 당위ㆍ과잉ㆍ폐기의 스펙트럼
역사교육
2005 .09
-
포스트모던 역사 이론의 '민족' 논의와 역사교육
역사교육
2002 .09
-
韓國史 認識과 國史敎育의 目標
역사교육
2000 .12
-
韓國 近現代史 敎育에서 民族主義와 近代主體
역사교육
2005 .09
-
Historical Characteristics of Korean Nationalism
Korea Journal
1966 .12
-
현재의 한국사 연구와 역사관 문제
韓國史學史學報
2003 .01
-
전근대 국사의 형성과 그 발전
韓國史學史學報
2008 .01
-
내재적 발전론과 민족주의
역사와현실
2010 .09
-
포스트모던 역사인식과 역사학습
역사교육
2000 .06
-
A Postmodern Turn in Korean Literature
Korea Journal
2007 .03
-
포스트모더니즘과 기독교교육 : 상생인가 해체인가?
기독교교육정보
2013 .03
-
Problems of Korean Nationalism
Korea Journal
1966 .12
-
大學 敎養敎育으로서의 歷史敎育의 方向
역사와 담론
1977 .04
-
탈근대에서 국사와 동아시아사
역사학보
2007 .12
-
한국 고대사 연구의 반성과 대안 -실증과 반도의 낡은 인식을 뛰어넘어-
고조선단군학
2004 .12
-
우리나라 역사연구의 궤적 검토와 좌표의 재설정
역사교육
2014 .06
-
정치민족주의와 문화민족주의
프랑스사 연구
2017 .08
-
최근 한국사 연구에 있어서 탈민족주의 경향에 대한 비판적 검토
한국고대사연구
2008 .12
-
새로운 세계사와 지구사 : 포스트모던 시대의 성찰적 역사
역사학보
2002 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-374-015490519