지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The World Heritage Convention, one of the most successful program established by UNESCO in 1972, applies only to tangible cultural and natural heritage. Because it does not include intangibles, many member states expressed a need for a program that would protect intangible cultural heritage as well. In light of these concerns, UNESCO adopted the "Recommendation on the Safeguarding of Traditional Culture and Folklore" in 1989. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the program that resulted from this recommendation and point out its significance.
Intangible heritage is often identified with national or ethnic groups and plays an important role in maintaining cultural identity and diversity. However, due to globalization or other transnational developments, such as commercialization, war, industralization, cultural standardization, migration, and urbanization, many items of intangible heritage are in danger of disappearance. In order to respond to the emergency of disappearing intangible cultural heritage, UNESCO's Executive Board adopted in 1998 the "Proclamation of Masterpieces of the Oral and Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity."
The 1st Proclamation occurred in 2001. Member states submitted candidature files by December of 2000, and the UNESCO secretariat sent the candidature files to NGO experts for evaluation. UNESCO's director general appointed 18 international jurors, who were charged with selecting for UNESCO's designation the masterpieces from among the candidature files that had been evaluated by the NGOs. The international jury met from May 15 to 18 to make its choices. Each candidature me was reviewed by examining submitted written material and videos. As a result, 19 of the 32 candidature files were selected.
The second proclamation meeting was held two years later on November of 2003. The procedures used were similar to those of the first. This time, 56 member states submitted candidature files (of which 4 were multinational candidatures), and intangible heritage items of 28 nations were selected. The next proclamation meeting will occur in 2005.
UNESCO's new proclamation program has had two major impacts. The first is that intangible heritage is becoming recognized as being as valuable as tangible heritage. It is often thought that tangible heritage is more important and worthwhile for protection, and thus intangible has been given less attention or even ignored entirely. Now, however, it is hoped that public will value the latter as much as the former.
The second impact of the new program is that non-western Europe member states are becoming more active in cultural heritage protection. Among the 47 proclaimed masterpieces, only 3 intangibles are from the Western European member states whereas 15 have been selected from Asia. While tangible cultural heritage policies and cultural hegemony have been focused largely on western nations, intangible cultural heritage is now primarily being accomplished by non-western states.
Intangible heritage is often identified with national or ethnic groups and plays an important role in maintaining cultural identity and diversity. However, due to globalization or other transnational developments, such as commercialization, war, industralization, cultural standardization, migration, and urbanization, many items of intangible heritage are in danger of disappearance. In order to respond to the emergency of disappearing intangible cultural heritage, UNESCO's Executive Board adopted in 1998 the "Proclamation of Masterpieces of the Oral and Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity."
The 1st Proclamation occurred in 2001. Member states submitted candidature files by December of 2000, and the UNESCO secretariat sent the candidature files to NGO experts for evaluation. UNESCO's director general appointed 18 international jurors, who were charged with selecting for UNESCO's designation the masterpieces from among the candidature files that had been evaluated by the NGOs. The international jury met from May 15 to 18 to make its choices. Each candidature me was reviewed by examining submitted written material and videos. As a result, 19 of the 32 candidature files were selected.
The second proclamation meeting was held two years later on November of 2003. The procedures used were similar to those of the first. This time, 56 member states submitted candidature files (of which 4 were multinational candidatures), and intangible heritage items of 28 nations were selected. The next proclamation meeting will occur in 2005.
UNESCO's new proclamation program has had two major impacts. The first is that intangible heritage is becoming recognized as being as valuable as tangible heritage. It is often thought that tangible heritage is more important and worthwhile for protection, and thus intangible has been given less attention or even ignored entirely. Now, however, it is hoped that public will value the latter as much as the former.
The second impact of the new program is that non-western Europe member states are becoming more active in cultural heritage protection. Among the 47 proclaimed masterpieces, only 3 intangibles are from the Western European member states whereas 15 have been selected from Asia. While tangible cultural heritage policies and cultural hegemony have been focused largely on western nations, intangible cultural heritage is now primarily being accomplished by non-western states.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 본론
Ⅲ. 맺음말
참고문헌
「유네스코 세계 무형문화 유산제도와 그 의미」에 대한 토론문
참고문헌 (7)
참고문헌 신청
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 2001 / he UNESCO Recommendation on the Safeguarding of Traditional Culture and Folklore (1989):Actions Undertaken by UNESCO for ItsImplementation:Safeguarding Tradional Cultures:A Global Assessment ( )
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 2001 / A Historical Study on the Preparation of the 1989 Recommendation on the Safeguarding of Tradional Culture and Folklore:Safeguarding Tradional Cultures:A Global Assessment
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 2000 / UNESCO, Proclamation of Masterpieces of the Oral and Intangible Heritage of Humanity:Guide for the Presentation of Candidature Files
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 2001 / Proclamation of Masterpieces of the Oral and Intangible Heritage of Humanity:Guide for the Presentation of Candidature Files
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 2003 / Final Report:International Jury for the Proclamation by UNESCO of : 21 ~
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 2001 / A Historical Study on the Preparation of the 1989 Recommendation on the Safeguarding of Tradional Culture and Folklore:Safeguarding Tradional Cultures:A Global Assessment
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 2000 / UNESCO, Proclamation of Masterpieces of the Oral and Intangible Heritage of Humanity:Guide for the Presentation of Candidature Files
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 2001 / Proclamation of Masterpieces of the Oral and Intangible Heritage of Humanity:Guide for the Presentation of Candidature Files
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 2003 / Final Report:International Jury for the Proclamation by UNESCO of : 21 ~
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
유네스코 무형문화유산 체제의 성립과 전략적 수용 : 한중일의 동아시아 삼국을 중심으로
비교민속학
2017 .08
-
중국 몽골족의 국가급 무형문화유산에 관한 고찰
중국소설논총
2014 .01
-
무형문화재의 전승실태와 개선방안
비교민속학
2005 .02
-
“와쇼쿠(和食)”의 탄생
대한일어일문학회 학술대회 발표논문 요지집
2017 .04
-
한국 중요무형문화재 명칭의 중국어 번역 방안 연구
번역학연구
2018 .09
-
세계유산보호와 개발, 지속가능발전의 국제적 동향
역사와실학
2007 .06
-
아시아 각국의 무형문화유산 정책
비교민속학
2008 .12
-
한ㆍ일 전통 공연예술의 유파 전승과 무형문화재 제도 비교연구 : 교겐과 판소리를 중심으로
비교민속학
2012 .12
-
무형문화유산의 문화정치학 : 유네스코 체제에 대한 한국의 대응을 중심으로
실천민속학연구
2015 .08
-
유네스코 무형문화유산 체제와 동아시아 민속학 : 중국과 일본의 경우를 중심으로
민속학연구
2015 .12
-
동북아시아 국가 간 문화소통에 대한 시론적 연구 : 유네스코(UNESCO) 인류무형문화유산의 비판적 검토를 중심으로
비교민속학
2015 .04
-
한국 한문학의 用事와 知的 體系에 대한 연구
동방한문학
2018 .01
-
인류무형유산 씨름의 남북 공동등재 의미와 과제
비교민속학
2019 .08
-
유네스코 세계무형문화 유산으로 지정된 한국, 중국, 일본, 인도의 무형문화재의 보존현황과 전승방안에 대한 비교 연구
비교민속학
2004 .08
-
지속가능개발과 한국무형문화유산정책
헤리티지:역사와 과학
2016 .01
-
무형문화재 관련 법률의 제 문제
비교민속학
2018 .12
-
중국의 유네스코 무형문화유산에 대한 초탐(初探) : 소수민족의 무형문화유산을 중심으로
로컬리티 인문학
2014 .10
-
중국 국가급 무형문화유산 목록의 고찰― 소수민족의 목록을 중심으로
중국소설논총
2014 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-380-017628951