메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국국제조세협회 조세학술논집 租稅學術論集 第22輯 第1號
발행연도
2006.2
수록면
113 - 139 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Unlike taxes on income(profit) and consumption, property taxation around the world has wide variety of forms and structures. OECD classification of taxes on property (4000 digit category) on which its member countries' taxes on property are compared on equal footings is used to figure out whether Korea's recurrent taxes on immovable property(4100 sub-category) burden is heavy with respect to GDP or total tax revenue. We find that the share of real estate holdings tax among total tax revenue is around the average while the ratio of (broader) ratio of property taxes among total tax revenue is very high, 12%. This symptom is highlighted by 'the high transacation tax - cum - low holdings tax' feature of the Korean tax structure.
Also, when we compared the 30 OECD member countries' local to central government share of property tax base, Korea has the unique feature that even the transaction taxes of property(4400) belong to the provincial-level local government while the 4100 category taxes on real estate holdings are mostly lower-level local taxes. Since the taxing powers of local governments in Korea have been constrained by the central government in terms of their tax base and rate setting, there continues to exist conflict between central government's motivation of use local turn-over and holdings taxes for real estate market stabilization policy purpose and local governments' revenue neutral purpose.
Finally, it is noted that even if individual effective holdings-tax burden on each property or its owner in Korea is estimated to be less than 1%, it is hard to conclusively say that it is low compared with other OECD member countries given other things being equal, and it is the primary cause of the speculative demand for real estate asset. When we examined the US major cities' effective local property tax burden together with their previous one or five years housing price inflation figures, we cannot find any linear correlation between the local property tax burden and housing price appreciation that the house price has been more stable in higher property tax jurisdictions.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 부동산보유세의 국제비교
Ⅲ. 부동산보유세 국제비교의 시사점
Ⅳ. 요약과 결론
〈참고문헌〉
〈부록〉
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (8)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-329-016731083