지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
What was the Vietnamese perception of their own history in premodern times? This study is an effort to shed some light on this question on which few studies have been done so far. The study especially focuses on that of Le Van Huu and Ngo Si Lien who are the two of the most well-known historians in traditional Vietnam.
Le Van Huu is the compiler of the Dai Viet Su Ky in 1272 which covers the period from Trieu Da's reign in the third century B.C. to the end of the Ly dynasty(1009-1225). Ngo Si Lien compiled the Dai Viet Su Ky Toan Thu in 1479 which was the revised and enlarged edition of Le Van Huu's Dai Viet Su Ky. Ngo Si Lien's book covers the period from the very beginning of Vietnamese history to the end of the Tran dynasty(1225-1400).
What the two historians attract my attention is their comments on the historical persons and events which are intended to teach the lessons of the past in order to instruct the people, especially the rulers and those in the ruling class, living in the present and future.
Le Van Huu and Ngo Si Lien have the different perception of history mainly because they lived in the different period of times. When Le Van Huu compiled his book, the Tran dynasty was facing the possible invasion of the Mongols. Therefore, he was more concerned with the national security than any thing else. Under these circumstances, he was interested in the persons who kept Vietnam independent from the Chinese invasion and its stance equal to China. This is why he highly praised those persons, such as Trieu Da and Dinh Bo Linh. As an Confucian scholar, he was also opposed to the influence of Buddhism on the royal courts. However, he did not mention his opposition to it directly. The reason seems to be that Buddhism was prevalent throughout the Tran dynasty.
Unlike Le Van Huu, Ngo Si Lien's main concern was with the spread of the Confucian classical wisdom like "righteous duty", "humaneness", "husband wife relationship", etc. The reason is that he compiled his book under the rule of Le Thanh Tong who, more than any monarch before him, stressed the importance of Confucianism. Therefore, he condemned Dinh Bo Linh' s practice of polygamy, and Le Hoans making himself emperor, dethroning Dinh Bo Linhs son. He also criticised the Tran emperors' protecting Buddhism. On the other hand, he showed an interest in keeping national independence. It is because he worried the reinvasion of China in the future if the Le dynasty would get weak.
To sum up, Le Van Huu is more concerned with Vietnamese equality to China than the spread of Confucianism. In contrast with Le Van Huu, Ngo Si Lien is more interested in the spread of the Confucian ideology than the Vietnamese independence from China.
Le Van Huu is the compiler of the Dai Viet Su Ky in 1272 which covers the period from Trieu Da's reign in the third century B.C. to the end of the Ly dynasty(1009-1225). Ngo Si Lien compiled the Dai Viet Su Ky Toan Thu in 1479 which was the revised and enlarged edition of Le Van Huu's Dai Viet Su Ky. Ngo Si Lien's book covers the period from the very beginning of Vietnamese history to the end of the Tran dynasty(1225-1400).
What the two historians attract my attention is their comments on the historical persons and events which are intended to teach the lessons of the past in order to instruct the people, especially the rulers and those in the ruling class, living in the present and future.
Le Van Huu and Ngo Si Lien have the different perception of history mainly because they lived in the different period of times. When Le Van Huu compiled his book, the Tran dynasty was facing the possible invasion of the Mongols. Therefore, he was more concerned with the national security than any thing else. Under these circumstances, he was interested in the persons who kept Vietnam independent from the Chinese invasion and its stance equal to China. This is why he highly praised those persons, such as Trieu Da and Dinh Bo Linh. As an Confucian scholar, he was also opposed to the influence of Buddhism on the royal courts. However, he did not mention his opposition to it directly. The reason seems to be that Buddhism was prevalent throughout the Tran dynasty.
Unlike Le Van Huu, Ngo Si Lien's main concern was with the spread of the Confucian classical wisdom like "righteous duty", "humaneness", "husband wife relationship", etc. The reason is that he compiled his book under the rule of Le Thanh Tong who, more than any monarch before him, stressed the importance of Confucianism. Therefore, he condemned Dinh Bo Linh' s practice of polygamy, and Le Hoans making himself emperor, dethroning Dinh Bo Linhs son. He also criticised the Tran emperors' protecting Buddhism. On the other hand, he showed an interest in keeping national independence. It is because he worried the reinvasion of China in the future if the Le dynasty would get weak.
To sum up, Le Van Huu is more concerned with Vietnamese equality to China than the spread of Confucianism. In contrast with Le Van Huu, Ngo Si Lien is more interested in the spread of the Confucian ideology than the Vietnamese independence from China.
목차
머리말
Ⅰ. 『大越史記全書』의 성립과정
Ⅱ. 黎文休 : 중국에의 對等性 중심 史觀 및 儒家的 역사인식
Ⅲ. 吳士連 : 儒家 중심적 歷史觀 및 국가의 安危意識
맺음말
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
中國近代
역사학보
2002 .09
-
中國近代
역사학보
2004 .09
-
中國의 傳統科學과 自然觀에 대한 올바른 이해
한국사 시민강좌
1995 .02
-
나의 中國 秘密社會 연구 40년
중국근현대사연구
2004 .12
-
中國近世의 農業과 社會變化
동양사학연구
1992 .10
-
中國近世 Ⅱ (明ㆍ淸)
역사학보
2000 .09
-
中國近世Ⅱ(明ㆍ淸)
역사학보
2004 .09
-
中國近世 Ⅱ(明ㆍ淸)
역사학보
2002 .09
-
中國모더니즘 운동의 흐름――詩를 중심으로
중국어문논역총간
1998 .12
-
[해외 학계 동향_중국]중국선(中國禪)의 형성(1)
오늘의 동양사상
2004 .09
-
中國詩歌 飜譯의 諸問題
중국어문논역총간
2002 .06
-
일제강점기 中國語會話書에 나타난 어휘 연구
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2014 .06
-
關於韓國的漢語敎育情況
중국어문학논집
2004 .02
-
中國近世 Ⅰ (宋ㆍ遼ㆍ金ㆍ元)
역사학보
2006 .09
-
路遙 소설에 나타난 1980年代 中國 回鄕知靑 서사 연구
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2019 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-016406051