지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2003.9
- 수록면
- 213 - 234 (22page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Park Jae-ka (朴齊家, 1750-1805) and Lee Hee-kyung (李喜經, 1745-1805?) were the scholars of Northern Learning School. They proposed to enrich the nation and to secure the livelihood of people through the development of commerce and industry.
They had the same thoughts on Chosun vessels. Through the journey to China, they witnessed the wide expansion of Chinese ceramic use and technical development of ceramic manufacturing. And they acknowledged the superiority of Japanese to Chosun in technology and manufacturing system.
Comparing the technique of Chosun with the one of China and Japan, they pointed out problems of Chosun ceramic manufacturing technique and criticized the kiln operating system. They proposed an introduction of Chinese and Japanese techniques and technological policies.
To have a correct point of view on their proposals and severe criticisms, we have to consider some matters. First, they neither spoke for all of the Chosun consumers nor fairly represented the style and technique of Chosun porcelain. It is because not only the self-examination which resulted from the study of Chosun porcelain, but also their preference for the foreign ceramics, provided the momentum of the proposals and criticism.
Second, their technical records of Chosun porcelain were not free from mistakes because they didn't participate in making ceramics. We have to take into consideration what they pointed out; whether Chosun white clay, which is inferior to Chinese and Japanese clay on the whiteness and high fire resistance, is suitable to make ceramics similar to Chinese or Japanese ones: whether over-glaze decoration of porcelain was to our taste and Chinese style kiln was suitable to fire Chosun porcelain.
Next, they hardly paid attention to the aesthetics and styles of the Chosun porcelain. Generally speaking, how to view the vessels can be changeable depending on the viewers and times. But not only technique but also style have to be considered to appreciate the ceramics simultaneously. Even though the manufacturing technique of ceramics was underdeveloped, we could not underestimate themselves.
In spite of previous stated problems, their records have an art historical significance. Through them, we learned views of the Northern Learning School scholars on the contemporary Chosun, Chinese and Japanese ceramics and the technical problems of Chosun ceramics.
They had the same thoughts on Chosun vessels. Through the journey to China, they witnessed the wide expansion of Chinese ceramic use and technical development of ceramic manufacturing. And they acknowledged the superiority of Japanese to Chosun in technology and manufacturing system.
Comparing the technique of Chosun with the one of China and Japan, they pointed out problems of Chosun ceramic manufacturing technique and criticized the kiln operating system. They proposed an introduction of Chinese and Japanese techniques and technological policies.
To have a correct point of view on their proposals and severe criticisms, we have to consider some matters. First, they neither spoke for all of the Chosun consumers nor fairly represented the style and technique of Chosun porcelain. It is because not only the self-examination which resulted from the study of Chosun porcelain, but also their preference for the foreign ceramics, provided the momentum of the proposals and criticism.
Second, their technical records of Chosun porcelain were not free from mistakes because they didn't participate in making ceramics. We have to take into consideration what they pointed out; whether Chosun white clay, which is inferior to Chinese and Japanese clay on the whiteness and high fire resistance, is suitable to make ceramics similar to Chinese or Japanese ones: whether over-glaze decoration of porcelain was to our taste and Chinese style kiln was suitable to fire Chosun porcelain.
Next, they hardly paid attention to the aesthetics and styles of the Chosun porcelain. Generally speaking, how to view the vessels can be changeable depending on the viewers and times. But not only technique but also style have to be considered to appreciate the ceramics simultaneously. Even though the manufacturing technique of ceramics was underdeveloped, we could not underestimate themselves.
In spite of previous stated problems, their records have an art historical significance. Through them, we learned views of the Northern Learning School scholars on the contemporary Chosun, Chinese and Japanese ceramics and the technical problems of Chosun ceramics.
목차
Ⅰ. 서언
Ⅱ. 정책과 제도
Ⅲ. 제작기술
Ⅳ. 결언
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
18ㆍ19세기 日本 磁器의 유입과 전개양상
미술사논단
2009 .12
-
조선에 울려 퍼진 여성의 음악 소리: ‘조선’ 여성이 ‘서양’음악에 주목한 이유에 대하여
音.樂.學
2019 .01
-
朝鮮前期 ‘軟質白磁’ 製作技術에 대한 科學的 硏究
미술사학
2006 .08
-
조선시대 백자연구에서의 인식과 서술문제
미술사학
2007 .08
-
조선족미술의 시공(時空) : <중국조선민족미술사>와 <中國朝鮮族繪畵史硏究>에 대한 소견
민족미학
2009 .12
-
The poster design of 2016 exhibition about inheritance of lasting appeal of northern porcelains and innovative porcelain art
한국디자인학회 국제초대전도록
2016 .12
-
17-18세기 동아시아 도자교류사 연구
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2001 .12
-
조선후기 상주 백자의 문헌적 일고찰
한국디자인포럼
2012 .01
-
高麗 中期 輸入 中國白磁의 系統과 性格
미술사연구
2011 .12
-
근대전환기 국내 사료 분석을 통한 서양자기 사용실태 연구 : 식기를 중심으로
미술사학
2017 .02
-
관지 유형을 통해 본 조선 후기 백자의 외래 요소
미술사논단
2016 .06
-
朝鮮時代 象嵌白磁의 編年 硏究
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2003 .12
-
조선중기 지방백자 연구
미술사연구
2007 .12
-
1930년대 『每日申報』에 표출된 도자정책의 시기적 쟁점
한국근현대미술사학
2018 .07
-
1970년대 한국 모노크롬의 기원과 전통성
미술사논단
2002 .12
-
근대 유럽에서 한국도자에 대한 인식 변화와 그 배경
한국근현대미술사학
2018 .12
-
11세기말-12세기 전반 高麗靑瓷에 보이는 中國陶瓷의 영향
미술사학
2007 .08
-
한국 도자사 연구 어떻게 할 것인가
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2004 .03
-
한국 산업자기의 발전방안 연구
한국디자인문화학회지
2008 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-609-014719139