지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2005.12
- 수록면
- 89 - 121 (33page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Protection of intellectual property rights is an idea applied worldwide today. The purpose of protection of intellectual property rights being development of culture, and the important method of this purpose is giving intellectual-property-rights person a privilege that of the right of exclusive protection. However, today the exclusive right is more strengthened, so the freedom of expression is a risk of shrinking. The freedom of expression is protected by using and copying the earlier creative work freely, and we could create new creative work. But it would be impossible if intellectual property rights would strengthened to the extent that the existing creation thing cannot be used. This paper focus on copyright without considering all kinds of intellectual-property-rights. The reason is that only the essential of intellectual property rights are explained in this paper
The constitution does not accept the exclusive control about all information which carried out unrestricted. It is expressed by giving all people the freedom of sharing information. However, it seems obtain people's consent that a creative works could controled exclusively. Because giving some economical motivations about creative works brings the result which raises creation volition. However, the grade and method of the protection about copyright became a problem. So, the problem of accepting exclusive control, and the problem of adjusting the term of the protection are the essential thing of copyright authorization.
This study look at whether protection of intellectual property is correctly compromised so that synergy can do a creator's right and a user's right enough today or not. This study does not tend to clarify the problem of a specific intellectual-property-rights law, and does not tend to assert establishment or revision certain specific law. Merely, considering constitutional view, I will see that the beginning of the protection of the copyright owner, and the problem of conflict with other fundamental rights provided constitution, and that what is the desirable method if some problem occur. For this reason, I observe what is copyright, and what occurrence circumstance bring copyright. Here I look the history of copyright, and then search the history of Korean copyright law and American copyright law briefly. Then, for comprehension of intellectual property rights that is growing based on traditional property right theory, this paper would research the making and processing history of property-rights. And on this basic comprehension, this paper would explain the position of copyright that a kind of property right. How does the South Korean constitution understand copyright? We obtain this answer through the study of constitution text that include information conception. The last, I would indicate a right way to understand copyright through saying the constitutional meaning of the term of copyright protection, and searching how much the P2P(peer-to-peer) service interrupt the copyright. In addition, we will regard whether 'free-use' is a beneficial means to help information sharing or not.
The constitution does not accept the exclusive control about all information which carried out unrestricted. It is expressed by giving all people the freedom of sharing information. However, it seems obtain people's consent that a creative works could controled exclusively. Because giving some economical motivations about creative works brings the result which raises creation volition. However, the grade and method of the protection about copyright became a problem. So, the problem of accepting exclusive control, and the problem of adjusting the term of the protection are the essential thing of copyright authorization.
This study look at whether protection of intellectual property is correctly compromised so that synergy can do a creator's right and a user's right enough today or not. This study does not tend to clarify the problem of a specific intellectual-property-rights law, and does not tend to assert establishment or revision certain specific law. Merely, considering constitutional view, I will see that the beginning of the protection of the copyright owner, and the problem of conflict with other fundamental rights provided constitution, and that what is the desirable method if some problem occur. For this reason, I observe what is copyright, and what occurrence circumstance bring copyright. Here I look the history of copyright, and then search the history of Korean copyright law and American copyright law briefly. Then, for comprehension of intellectual property rights that is growing based on traditional property right theory, this paper would research the making and processing history of property-rights. And on this basic comprehension, this paper would explain the position of copyright that a kind of property right. How does the South Korean constitution understand copyright? We obtain this answer through the study of constitution text that include information conception. The last, I would indicate a right way to understand copyright through saying the constitutional meaning of the term of copyright protection, and searching how much the P2P(peer-to-peer) service interrupt the copyright. In addition, we will regard whether 'free-use' is a beneficial means to help information sharing or not.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 저작권법의 발전과정
Ⅲ. 재산권으로서의 저작권
Ⅳ. 헌법상 지적재산과 타기본권과의 관계
Ⅴ. 저작권법 관련문제
Ⅵ. 맺음말
참고 문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
교육정보화를 위한 저작권법의 과제 -미국, 일본, 독일 저작권법상의 교육관련 규정을 중심으로-
法學論文集
2009 .01
-
표현의 자유와 저작권
경영법률
2008 .01
-
저작권의 침해 및 구제
경영법률
2007 .01
-
물권과 저작권의 공시제도에 관한 고찰
한양법학
2018 .02
-
중국의 지적재산권 보호제도
기업법연구
2007 .03
-
著作權法硏究-컴퓨터프로그램 著作權을 中心으로
법학연구
2004 .12
-
저작권침해의 구제에 관한 연구
법학연구
2005 .10
-
P2P와 저작권 보호
법학연구
2002 .12
-
Protecting Copyright Owners in Nigeria: A Panacea for Intellectual Development
International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology
2020 .03
-
전자출판 저작물의 적정보호 수준 : 법적, 경제학적 분석을 중심으로
한국언론학보
2000 .07
-
인터넷上의 著作權保護 및 著作權法 제25조의 問題點
법학연구
2008 .02
-
중국시장에서 해외저작권자의 인터넷 저작권 침해 구제방안에 관한 연구
인터넷전자상거래연구
2007 .03
-
지적재산권 보호를 위한 제도개선과제의 검토 및 그에 따른 법 개정 방향
법학연구
2004 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-019482331