지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2009.6
- 수록면
- 25 - 37 (13page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The objective of this paper is to illustrate how subjectification and intersubjectification (Traugott and Dasher 2002) are manifested in grammaticalization of a single lexeme the 'ground' in Korean, and how such processes exerted pressure onto Korean grammar. The extensiveness of grammaticalization and significance in emergence of new grammatical paradigms resulting in re-organization of grammar should merit in-depth research. Despite such significance, however, the 'ground' has received very limited attention beyond a simple description of metaphorical semantic extension, and a thorough analysis from the grammaticalization perspective has been under-represented. This paper intends to fill the gap.
Human conceptualization of logical structure in terms of a physical building seems robust across languages (Lakoff and Johnson 1980) as is shown by the fact that English ground refers to not only a spatial basis for a building but also a logical basis for a claim. Korean nominal the 'ground' is also polysemous with these meanings (i.e. 'land' and 'situation'), which is by no means surprising considering the pervasiveness of metaphor in human language.
More importantly, however, this lexeme the further advances in grammaticalization into diverse grammatical markers, such as connectives and sentential endings with numerous functions. For instance, the develops into connectives of consequentiality (e.g. -ltheyni, -ltheynikka, -ltheyko, etc.) and of adversativity (-ltheyciman, -ltheyntey, -ltheynteyto, etc.), a process attributable to subjectification of meaning.
Of special significance is its development into sentential endings. The lexeme the becomes a part of the verbal morphology, where diverse markers of grammatical concepts such as TAM, honorification, style indication, etc. form a constellation. From this process arises an array of sentential endings marking determinative intention (e.g. -ltheyta, -ltheynya, -ltheyya, etc.), regret and desideration (e.g. -ltheyntey, -ltheynteyyo,etc.), contingency (e.g. -ltheyko), supposition (e.g. -ltheynikka,-ltheynikkayo,etc.), and others. The emergence of this new paradigm of markers is attributable to subjectification and intersubjectification.
Through subjectification, diverse epistemic and conative conceptualizations make wayinto the semantics of these grammatical forms. The role of intersubjectification in this context is intriguing: these forms, largely originating from clausal connectives, lack markers of intersubjectivity, (which is highly grammaticalized in this language and must be obligatorily marked on the main verb,) and therefore, they employ other means of supplementing the absence of the intersubjectivity markers. Furthermore, since these sentential endings developed from connectives, acquisition of meanings as sentential endings entirely relies on the addressee's reconstruction of the ellipsis, which is a strikingly intersubjective phenomenon (cf. Rhee 2002).
Drawing upon the historical corpus data this paper traces the historical developmental path of the 'ground' from its lexical source in Middle Korean to diverse grammatical markers in Present Day Korean, and presents how elaborate subjectification and intersubjectification not only changed the life of a linguistic form but also exerted a far-reaching impact on the grammar of Korean.
Human conceptualization of logical structure in terms of a physical building seems robust across languages (Lakoff and Johnson 1980) as is shown by the fact that English ground refers to not only a spatial basis for a building but also a logical basis for a claim. Korean nominal the 'ground' is also polysemous with these meanings (i.e. 'land' and 'situation'), which is by no means surprising considering the pervasiveness of metaphor in human language.
More importantly, however, this lexeme the further advances in grammaticalization into diverse grammatical markers, such as connectives and sentential endings with numerous functions. For instance, the develops into connectives of consequentiality (e.g. -ltheyni, -ltheynikka, -ltheyko, etc.) and of adversativity (-ltheyciman, -ltheyntey, -ltheynteyto, etc.), a process attributable to subjectification of meaning.
Of special significance is its development into sentential endings. The lexeme the becomes a part of the verbal morphology, where diverse markers of grammatical concepts such as TAM, honorification, style indication, etc. form a constellation. From this process arises an array of sentential endings marking determinative intention (e.g. -ltheyta, -ltheynya, -ltheyya, etc.), regret and desideration (e.g. -ltheyntey, -ltheynteyyo,etc.), contingency (e.g. -ltheyko), supposition (e.g. -ltheynikka,-ltheynikkayo,etc.), and others. The emergence of this new paradigm of markers is attributable to subjectification and intersubjectification.
Through subjectification, diverse epistemic and conative conceptualizations make wayinto the semantics of these grammatical forms. The role of intersubjectification in this context is intriguing: these forms, largely originating from clausal connectives, lack markers of intersubjectivity, (which is highly grammaticalized in this language and must be obligatorily marked on the main verb,) and therefore, they employ other means of supplementing the absence of the intersubjectivity markers. Furthermore, since these sentential endings developed from connectives, acquisition of meanings as sentential endings entirely relies on the addressee's reconstruction of the ellipsis, which is a strikingly intersubjective phenomenon (cf. Rhee 2002).
Drawing upon the historical corpus data this paper traces the historical developmental path of the 'ground' from its lexical source in Middle Korean to diverse grammatical markers in Present Day Korean, and presents how elaborate subjectification and intersubjectification not only changed the life of a linguistic form but also exerted a far-reaching impact on the grammar of Korean.
목차
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Data: Lexical Meanings
3. Grammaticalization of the ‘ground‘
4. Discussion
5. Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
From Politeness Discourse Strategy to Grammar : Grammaticalization of Stance Markers
언어과학연구
2011 .12
-
조건 표지에서 문장종결 표지로의 문법화
담화와인지
2001 .06
-
The Power of the Unspoken: Ellipsis and Grammaticalization in Korean and Beyond
언어학 연구
2020 .07
-
A Corpus-Based Analysis of the Functional Split of the Lexical Item the ‘ground’ in Korean
언어과학연구
2019 .03
-
On the Emergence of Diverse Functions of As : A Grammaticalization Perspective
담화와인지
2012 .12
-
On Polygrammaticalization of See-Derived Auxiliaries in Korean
담화와인지
2019 .05
-
Grammaticalization of the Plural Marker in Korean: From Object to Text to Stance
언어과학
2018 .01
-
높임 형태 ‘-으시-’의 들을이 지향적 쓰임에 대한 연구
겨레어문학
2020 .01
-
A Corpus-based Study of the Grammaticalization of ‘Take’ into Instrumental, Sequential, and Causal Markers in Korean
언어
2008 .09
-
On Form-function Mismatch Puzzles in Fragments : An Ellipsis Approach
담화와인지
2006 .04
-
Sentential Subjects Revisited
새한영어영문학
2015 .02
-
Polygrammaticalization of the Korean toy-‘become’ and Its Conceptual Network
언어과학연구
2020 .06
-
Historical Review of Korean Family Life
Korea Journal
1963 .10
-
The Role of Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity in the Grammaticalization of Icey in Korean
담화와인지
2007 .08
-
한국어 어휘격, 부사격 조사의 문법화 양상
어문연구
2018 .01
-
The Korean Take-off
Korea Journal
1972 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-701-018678156