메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
주혁규 (경상대학교)
저널정보
새한영어영문학회 새한영어영문학 새한영어영문학 제51권 4호
발행연도
2009.11
수록면
61 - 82 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Materiality is one that appears with increasing frequency in de Man’s later works. It has differing registers, all elliptical but interrelated: “a material vision,” “the materiality of the letter,” “the materiality of an inscription,” and “the materiality of actual history, for example. De Man writes that it cannot be exactly understood in any linguistic terms; as pure anteriority, it eludes cognition and cannot be accessible through our physical senses. Its emergence in de Man’s writings, especially in later years, marks a remarkable shift in his critical-linguistic apparatus from tropological displacements to what conditions and limits any metaphoricity. Drawing on this enigmatic entity of materiality, he seems to be engaged in a critical process of revaluing the concepts of history and aesthetics, concepts that, he argues, have been received in accordance with the model of practicality, empirical appeals, identity politics, and all forms of metaphorical self-transparency.
If so, the critical examination of de Man’s materiality is a prerequisite for understanding his unique ideas of history, ideology, linguistic practices, body, and aesthetics. Therefore, the first part of this paper is mainly dedicated to analyzing de Man’s notion of irony and allegory, two central rhetorical concepts that characterize his linguistic principles in his later years. The assumptions of these concepts, insists de Man, radically question the legitimacy of cognitive and metaphorical models as proper critical paradigms. After this, this paper moves to a critical examination of his view of history, ideology, and aesthetics, all of which are built upon his unique linguistic principles and are undeniably affiliated with what is implied or involved in his ideas of materiality. The central argument of this paper is that de Man’s term of materiality disarticulates any attempts at referential totality. Instead, it proposes the practice of de-metaphorization and dis-figuration, thereby bespeaking a protocol of deconstructive reading that resists all forms of appropriation.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-840-019099920