지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2006.12
- 수록면
- 9 - 165 (158page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Considering legislative discretion and legislative policy of the National Assembly, limitation on the people's freedom and rights should be minimized to prevent legislation from infringing on essential contents of the basic rights. Therefore, improvement of the Criminal Law had limitation of demand and legislation of Article 10 of the Constitution that respected and protected the dignity and values of men. When lawmakers asked judges to sentence and examine an offence, they should set up a wide range of legal punishment enough to sentence punishment in accordance judges' responsibilities and apply the principle of individualized punishment and to implement the principle of actual law-governed country by constitutional limitation. To take actions flexibly against a variety of phenomenon of modern society that varied fluidly and variably, lawmakers might enact laws and regulations and improve cases requiring justification by legislation: But, lawmakers should keep constitutional limitation as well as essential limits at the improvement.
When lawmakers enacted and revised punishment rights, they were demanded to improve not only criminal contents corresponding to constituent conditions and factors but also legal punishment of each crime. In other words, lawmakers were not allowed to infringe on essential contents of the basic rights at not only behavioral contents being objects of enforcement of punishment rights but also concrete legal punishment corresponding to each behavioral content, and they were demanded to keep principles of clearness between each content of punishment, proportion and prohibition of excess, etc.
Therefore, the paper compared each behavioral mode and legal punishment to find out reasonable standards of freedom sentence and fine punishment and to examine appropriateness and improvement of each legal punishment of the Criminal Law: In other words, the paper examined basic directions of improvement of legal punishment by improving punishment laws and regulations based on the principles limiting criminal legislation.
Firstly, the behaviors that existing laws regulated to crimes should be deleted to remove legal punishment itself. Secondly, observance of the principle of equity and proportion might be suggested to punish intentional offence and negligence. And, punishment regulation itself that corresponded to legal punishment of the general provisions might be improved. Lastly, legal punishment of each individual crime might be improved. In other words, regulations of the followings might be suggested: for instance, the term of imprisonment, fine punishment being proportional to freedom sentence, the term of suspension of qualification being proportional to freedom sentence and fine punishment, and legal punishment of freedom sentence between each individual crime being proportional to protected legal interest.
When lawmakers enacted and revised punishment rights, they were demanded to improve not only criminal contents corresponding to constituent conditions and factors but also legal punishment of each crime. In other words, lawmakers were not allowed to infringe on essential contents of the basic rights at not only behavioral contents being objects of enforcement of punishment rights but also concrete legal punishment corresponding to each behavioral content, and they were demanded to keep principles of clearness between each content of punishment, proportion and prohibition of excess, etc.
Therefore, the paper compared each behavioral mode and legal punishment to find out reasonable standards of freedom sentence and fine punishment and to examine appropriateness and improvement of each legal punishment of the Criminal Law: In other words, the paper examined basic directions of improvement of legal punishment by improving punishment laws and regulations based on the principles limiting criminal legislation.
Firstly, the behaviors that existing laws regulated to crimes should be deleted to remove legal punishment itself. Secondly, observance of the principle of equity and proportion might be suggested to punish intentional offence and negligence. And, punishment regulation itself that corresponded to legal punishment of the general provisions might be improved. Lastly, legal punishment of each individual crime might be improved. In other words, regulations of the followings might be suggested: for instance, the term of imprisonment, fine punishment being proportional to freedom sentence, the term of suspension of qualification being proportional to freedom sentence and fine punishment, and legal punishment of freedom sentence between each individual crime being proportional to protected legal interest.
목차
국문요약
제1장 서론
제2장 국가형벌권과 형사입법의 한계
제3장 법정형 정비의 기본방향
제4장 개별범죄의 법정형 정비방안
제5장 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Therapy or Punishment?
저스티스
1987 .12
-
중국형법상 기업의 처벌제도
비교형사법연구
2011 .01
-
형벌의 사회적 맥락 : 형벌사회학적 접근
교정연구
2006 .01
-
형벌의 철학적 기초 : 영미 형벌 정당화이론의 동향
중앙법학
2012 .09
-
처벌에 대한 사회학적 분석의 기초
한국사회과학연구
2004 .12
-
법정형으로서 합리적 벌금형을 위한 필요조건
형사법연구
2012 .01
-
양형의 필요충분조건으로서 책임과 예방에 관한 소고
법학연구
2010 .06
-
형법상 개별범죄 징역형 정비의 기초
형사정책연구
2011 .03
-
특정경제범죄 가중처벌 등에 관한 법률 제3조 제1항의 개정안에 대한 논의 : 배임죄와 관련하여
한양법학
2013 .08
-
합리적인 형사입법을 위한 방향
한양법학
2018 .08
-
사형제도의 위헌성 고찰
법학연구
2010 .05
-
가정 및 학교에서의 아동체벌에 관한 국제인권기준 분석 및 국내법 검토
중앙법학
2013 .03
-
사형의 대안으로서 절대적 종신형 도입방안
형사정책연구
2006 .06
-
[제2부 과학기술ㆍ정보분야] 형사특별법의 정비 및 편입방안
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2008 .12
-
꾸란에 근거한 이슬람 형벌에 관한 연구 -사우디아라비아를 중심으로-
중동연구
2011 .01
-
사형의 형벌적 특성에 관한 비판적 연구
형사법연구
2010 .01
-
형법의 重罰化 입법경향에 관한 비판적 고찰
법학연구
2011 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-364-003832442