지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper examines Kim, Dong-ri’s novel and criticism at ‘the time of Liberation’ focusing on the relationship between the orientation of his discourse and politics. His novels at this time are separated into two groups: one which reveals his intention directly and the other which conceals it. In one group of his novels, political and ideological confrontation is displaced into ethical conflict between good and evil. In the other group of his novels he goes beyond the political dimension and explores “the form of ultimate life”(“구경적 생의 형식”) or visualizes ‘analogical vision’ of the pre-modern world. While these two kinds of novels apparently show the opposite pattern, theysupplement each other as political discourses.
If Transmigrationism(「윤회설」) and Brother(「형제」) are the representative works of the former, Moon(「달」) and Yeokma(「역마」) belongs to the latter. In the former group of his novels, sometimes the protagonist expresses the novelist's political intention directly as his mouthpiece as in Transmigrationism or the ideological confrontation is displaced into ethical conflict between good and evil as in Brother. In the latter group of his novels, pre-modern ‘analogical vision’ becomes the essential principle of the configuration and the narrative as in Moon and Yeokma. While Transmigration and Brothers directly or implicitly express the novelist's political intention, Moon and Yeokma represents ultra-historical universality of pre-modern ‘analogical vision’, which is not related to the historical reality and social-political situation at ‘the time of Liberation’ at all.
It lies in the core of Kim, Dong-ri’s criticism that the novelist should transcend the finite utility of historical and political issues. Kim, Dong-ri’s literary discourse of ‘anti-politics’ insisted that literature should deal with the eternal and universal human problems transcending historical reality and the social-political situation. Its political effect was powerful, to the extent that it could nullify “historical materialism” of “Literary Alliance”, his opposite group at ‘the time of Liberation’.
If Transmigrationism(「윤회설」) and Brother(「형제」) are the representative works of the former, Moon(「달」) and Yeokma(「역마」) belongs to the latter. In the former group of his novels, sometimes the protagonist expresses the novelist's political intention directly as his mouthpiece as in Transmigrationism or the ideological confrontation is displaced into ethical conflict between good and evil as in Brother. In the latter group of his novels, pre-modern ‘analogical vision’ becomes the essential principle of the configuration and the narrative as in Moon and Yeokma. While Transmigration and Brothers directly or implicitly express the novelist's political intention, Moon and Yeokma represents ultra-historical universality of pre-modern ‘analogical vision’, which is not related to the historical reality and social-political situation at ‘the time of Liberation’ at all.
It lies in the core of Kim, Dong-ri’s criticism that the novelist should transcend the finite utility of historical and political issues. Kim, Dong-ri’s literary discourse of ‘anti-politics’ insisted that literature should deal with the eternal and universal human problems transcending historical reality and the social-political situation. Its political effect was powerful, to the extent that it could nullify “historical materialism” of “Literary Alliance”, his opposite group at ‘the time of Liberation’.
목차
〈국문 초록〉
1. 들어가며
2. 정치적 논설의 도입과 윤리적 대립의 구성
3. 유비적 세계상의 형상화와 정치적 이념의 은폐
4. 보편성의 담론과 반근대주의의 정치성
5. 나오며
[참고문헌]
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (1)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-809-004478368