메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이미순 (충북대학교)
저널정보
국어교육학회 국어교육연구 국어교육연구 제50집
발행연도
2012.2
수록면
589 - 612 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this paper, the arguments about image that appeared in Kim Soo-young’s poetics were observed in detail and their characteristics were identified. In actuality, his criticisms, his discussions on poetry had been centered around image. Then, entering the later part of the 1960s, he emphasized the ‘image’ of poetry even more as he explored the new trends in poetry.
However, he did not drag in theories about image from the Anglo -American poetics, which was considered an axis in his own poetics. By escaping from the conventional perception of image as a place in the mind or the thought of an object, he discussed by mainly associating image with the problems of reality. Through the phrase “a self comedic transformation,” he associated image with embodied discussions, i.e., the problems related to reality.
Image -- in the views of Kim Soo-young -- is amid a poet, reality and language and, without becoming any of these, it is something that makes everything possible. This perception of image was related to a new understanding of reality. To him, reality was something that encompasses facts and non-facts and something that comes out of continual metamorphoses of a language. In the process of explaining his work 〈The Snow〉, as well, which embodies his poetics, he mentioned the relationship between a poet, reality and language.
Kim Soo-young’s theory on image is a theory that came out of the poet’s real life experiences and, while it is an theory that belongs in the genealogy of image existentialism, it is a theory that encompassed political implications. Such his image theory has a significance that warrants a special attention in terms of the modern events of Korea. In addition, it is though that, even now, it’s a subject that needs to be continuously explored. This is because his theory on image was a result of all the efforts to overcome dichotomous oppositions.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 김수영의 시론과 이미지
Ⅲ. 김수영 이미지론의 양상
Ⅳ. 김수영 이미지론의 특징
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
[Abstract]

참고문헌 (15)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-710-001559084