메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
오경희 (부산대학교) 한대동 (부산대학교)
저널정보
한국수산해양교육학회 수산해양교육연구 수산해양교육연구 제24권 제4호 (통권 제58호)
발행연도
2012.8
수록면
543 - 558 (16page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This is a qualitative study of pre-service teachers’ experiences in a teaching practicum course which attempted to identify the characteristics of the course that has been recently revised as professional education course. Data were collected from college students who took the professional education courses including the teaching practicum course by using both a survey on the opinions and suggestions of the students on the teaching practicum and a in-depth interview with 12 students of them. The results are as follows.
First, pre-service teachers’ perception of a teaching practicum course was divided into two sides : functional side and sociocultural side. The formal is that the professional education courses significantly handed to discipline practical jobs related to educational administration. The latter is that the professional education courses significantly handed to deal for teachers like pay step, extra pay, vacation, and leave of absence.
Second, the pre-service teachers had suggestions that were divided into the ‘curriculum content’ and the ‘instructional method’. For instance, regarding the ‘curriculum content’ they suggested such things needed as ‘lessening and differentiation of content, sensitive about the scene, and lesson hands-on’, and as for the ‘instructional method’ they suggested such things needed as actively ‘doing, participating, assessing, coursework participating’.
Based on these results, I have comprehended the pre-service teachers’ positive response. Untill now, we have perceived that the professional education courses is excessively theory-oriented one. But a teaching practicum course is different. Meanwhile, It is not identify what the teaching practicum course as teaching refinement education course is. Due to this cause, I have comprehended that ‘curriculum content’ and the ‘instructional method’ is plunged in confusion. As pointed out this, I did concrete proposals in response to such a confusion. This proposals have helped decided on a direction of a teaching practicum course.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구 대상 및 방법
Ⅲ. 교직실무과목에 대한 인식과 제언
Ⅳ. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌

참고문헌 (29)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-529-003321898