지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article considered how marine rescue was made under certain system regarding marine accident of Chinese, Joseon (朝鮮) Dynasty’s, Ryukyu (琉球)’s, and Dutch ships before the appearance of Kurohune(黑船) which can be regarded as a starting point of port opening from the beginning of Edo Bakuhu (江戶幕府), Japan as materials, what were the regulations about marine rescue of foreign ships, and how such marine rescue functioned under certain correlation with so-called ‘4 diplomatic windows (四つの口)’ as diplomatic places of Edo era. The summary of this is as follows.
First, the regulation about dealing and managing of marine accident to foreign ships in Edo era was started to be settled in systematization of marine rescue centering on Nagasaki since 1635 when Bakuhu reinforced so-called ‘seclusion’ policy (鎖國政策) as a foreign restriction policy. Of course, according to the cases of some marine accidents before, the foreign ships were transferred to Nagasaki (長崎) but it was not the usage and only was settled as general regulation by the order of Bakuhu in 1635 as revealed in this article.
Second, Nagasaki systematization of marine rescue to foreign ships by Bakuhu was made within the close relationship with Christianity prohibition policy of Bakuhu. This can be verified from strict examination to suspicious ships as seen at the order to Daimyo in 1963 and from the order of prohibiting the landing of foreign ships’ crews and of convoying to Nagasaki after the uprising centering on christians which was known as ‘revolt of Shimabara (島原) and Amakusa (天草)’ in 1637. In such aspect, it is evaluated that christian related ships were excluded in the subjects of marine rescue to foreign ships and only the ships of nations admitted by Bakuhu were rescued.
Third, when summarizing managements and cases of marine rescues searched at this article, basic policy of marine rescue to foreign ships was set according to the foreign relationship policy by so-called ‘4 diplomatic windows’ which made an important base to the formation of Bakuhu’s international relationships. That is, as ‘4 diplomatic windows’, repatriation of castaways making as a stronghold to Nagasaki for Chinese and Dutch ships, Tsushima (對馬) for Joseon ships, and Satsuma (薩摩) for Ryukyu. This proves that ‘4 diplomatic windows’ which was a structural system of foreign relationship in Edo era functioned as a basic system of marine rescue.
Fourth, marine rescue system in Edo era was managed according to the policies of ‘trust exchanging countries’ and ‘trading countries’. These countries were secured their ships’ safety and repatriation but to the other countries, safety was not guaranteed and rather they were the subjects of Christianity prohibition policy. In particular, to Joseon and Ryukyu which were ‘trust exchanging country’, rescue costs were not an important matter, but to the ships of China and Netherlands which were ‘trading country’, the costs of tugboat for rescue were charged to them. While because marine rescue according to the policies of ‘trust exchanging countries’ and ‘trading countries’ was made at Tsushima and Satsuma for ‘trust exchanging country(Joseon)’ and at Nagasaki for ‘trading country (China, Netherlands)’, it was another proof that as a basic system of marine rescue, ‘4 diplomatic windows’ was functioned.
First, the regulation about dealing and managing of marine accident to foreign ships in Edo era was started to be settled in systematization of marine rescue centering on Nagasaki since 1635 when Bakuhu reinforced so-called ‘seclusion’ policy (鎖國政策) as a foreign restriction policy. Of course, according to the cases of some marine accidents before, the foreign ships were transferred to Nagasaki (長崎) but it was not the usage and only was settled as general regulation by the order of Bakuhu in 1635 as revealed in this article.
Second, Nagasaki systematization of marine rescue to foreign ships by Bakuhu was made within the close relationship with Christianity prohibition policy of Bakuhu. This can be verified from strict examination to suspicious ships as seen at the order to Daimyo in 1963 and from the order of prohibiting the landing of foreign ships’ crews and of convoying to Nagasaki after the uprising centering on christians which was known as ‘revolt of Shimabara (島原) and Amakusa (天草)’ in 1637. In such aspect, it is evaluated that christian related ships were excluded in the subjects of marine rescue to foreign ships and only the ships of nations admitted by Bakuhu were rescued.
Third, when summarizing managements and cases of marine rescues searched at this article, basic policy of marine rescue to foreign ships was set according to the foreign relationship policy by so-called ‘4 diplomatic windows’ which made an important base to the formation of Bakuhu’s international relationships. That is, as ‘4 diplomatic windows’, repatriation of castaways making as a stronghold to Nagasaki for Chinese and Dutch ships, Tsushima (對馬) for Joseon ships, and Satsuma (薩摩) for Ryukyu. This proves that ‘4 diplomatic windows’ which was a structural system of foreign relationship in Edo era functioned as a basic system of marine rescue.
Fourth, marine rescue system in Edo era was managed according to the policies of ‘trust exchanging countries’ and ‘trading countries’. These countries were secured their ships’ safety and repatriation but to the other countries, safety was not guaranteed and rather they were the subjects of Christianity prohibition policy. In particular, to Joseon and Ryukyu which were ‘trust exchanging country’, rescue costs were not an important matter, but to the ships of China and Netherlands which were ‘trading country’, the costs of tugboat for rescue were charged to them. While because marine rescue according to the policies of ‘trust exchanging countries’ and ‘trading countries’ was made at Tsushima and Satsuma for ‘trust exchanging country(Joseon)’ and at Nagasaki for ‘trading country (China, Netherlands)’, it was another proof that as a basic system of marine rescue, ‘4 diplomatic windows’ was functioned.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 해난구조의 나가사키 체제화
Ⅲ. 동아시아 선박의 해난구조
Ⅳ. 네덜란드 선박의 해난구조
Ⅴ. 맺음말-해난구조와 ‘4개의 창구’ 관계에 대해서
참고문헌
[ABSTRACT]
참고문헌 (44)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
조선시대 對馬島 연구의 현황과 과제
동북아역사논총
2013 .09
-
전 근대 한국의 海難救助와 漂流民 구조 시스템
동북아역사논총
2010 .06
-
근세 일본의 그리스도교 禁制政策과 珍島 표착 異國船의 처리
일본문화연구
2007 .10
-
근대 조선과 일본의 해난구조제도와 국제관계
동북아역사논총
2010 .06
-
朝鮮通信使와 對馬島의 關係
日本語敎育
2017 .01
-
江戸時代日本に残された漂流記
도서문화
2012 .12
-
Plans for Reducing Safety Accidents in Marine Leisure Activities by Developing and Installing Multi-Usage Floating Type Drifting Object (RESCUE BOAT 122 H)
해항도시문화교섭학
2018 .10
-
조선시대 제주인의 표류 발생 배경과 실태
탐라문화
2018 .01
-
浅谈中韩文化交流的现状、问题与对策 ― 以中国视角为中心
중국학
2017 .01
-
對馬島人 退去 이전의 朝日交涉
한일관계사연구
2017 .08
-
淸代 中國의 外國人 漂流民의 救助와 送還에 대하여 : 朝鮮人과 日本人의 사례를 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2010 .06
-
청나라 무역선의 일본 표류와『유방필어(遊房筆語)』 : 1780년 원순호(元順號)가 일본 치쿠라(千倉) 해역에 표류한 사건을 중심으로
아시아문화연구
2012 .06
-
The Purpose of the University in Developing Countries
Korea Journal
1968 .08
-
조선시대 필기 야담집 속 琉球 체험과 형상화
한문학논집(漢文學論集)
2011 .01
-
退溪 李滉의 일본 인식
아시아문화연구
2009 .05
-
조선초기(태조기~세종대) 대외정보 수집활동의 실상과 변화
역사와현실
2007 .09
-
朝蘇前期 '字小'에 대한 고찰 : 對馬島 倭人및 女眞 勢力을 중심으로
한일관계사연구
2009 .08
-
‘漂流’를 통해서 본 근대 한일관계 : 송환절차를 중심으로
한국사연구
2003 .12
-
19세기 후반 일본의 琉球병탄과 淸과의 영토분쟁 처리 : 琉球 분할소유 방안을 중심으로
역사와경계
2007 .12
-
Political Parties and Diplomatic Policy
Korea Journal
1967 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-910-002364212