지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
〈Silenced〉(2011) visualized an infringement upon personal rights of hearing-impaired children, and 〈Unbowed〉(2012) showed the anguish of the weak against the gigantic authority of the judicature. This study’s aim is to analyse this two films, which caused the social phenomenon of the self-questioning for the judicial system in korea.
Above all, this two films based on fact created the reality dispute. However, the film, both as media and as art, should be recognized by the filmological discourse and especially by the genre criticism focused on the courtroom drama. Therefore, this paper attempts to approach this two films from the perspective of genre ‘courtroom drama’ and its film grammar.
According to kuzina’s categorization of courtroom drama, the courtroom (or legal) drama means the dramatic fiction about crime and civil litigation, and includes as subtypes ‘courtroom whodunit’, ‘legal/justice thriller’, ‘lawyer film’, ‘juryroom drama’, ‘courtroom comedy’, ‘court-martial drama’, ‘social issue courtroom drama’ and so on. In addition to this subgerens, there is also hybrid forms.
〈Silenced〉 falls under the subgenres ‘social issue courtroom drama’ and ‘legal/justice thriller’, and 〈Unbowed〉 is affiliated to the subtypes ‘social issue courtroom drama’ and ‘lawyer film’. In this work, this two films are called as korean hybrid courtroom drama, which cause active communications in our society and independent discussions about the judicial arrangements. In other words, the large courtroom drama audiences form spontaneously a social consensus, and this phenomenon works as a huge observational power toward the society.
Above all, this two films based on fact created the reality dispute. However, the film, both as media and as art, should be recognized by the filmological discourse and especially by the genre criticism focused on the courtroom drama. Therefore, this paper attempts to approach this two films from the perspective of genre ‘courtroom drama’ and its film grammar.
According to kuzina’s categorization of courtroom drama, the courtroom (or legal) drama means the dramatic fiction about crime and civil litigation, and includes as subtypes ‘courtroom whodunit’, ‘legal/justice thriller’, ‘lawyer film’, ‘juryroom drama’, ‘courtroom comedy’, ‘court-martial drama’, ‘social issue courtroom drama’ and so on. In addition to this subgerens, there is also hybrid forms.
〈Silenced〉 falls under the subgenres ‘social issue courtroom drama’ and ‘legal/justice thriller’, and 〈Unbowed〉 is affiliated to the subtypes ‘social issue courtroom drama’ and ‘lawyer film’. In this work, this two films are called as korean hybrid courtroom drama, which cause active communications in our society and independent discussions about the judicial arrangements. In other words, the large courtroom drama audiences form spontaneously a social consensus, and this phenomenon works as a huge observational power toward the society.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 선행연구
3. 법정영화
4. 한국의 법정영화
5. 나가는 말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (20)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - Harris, Thomas / 1987 / Courtroom’s Finest Hour in American Cinema / Metuchen
2. [단행본] - Henschke, Frank / 2002 / Reclams Sachlexikon des Films / Stuttgart
3. [단행본] - Kuzina, Matthias / 2000 / Der amerikanische Gerichtsfilm. Justiz, Ideologie, Dramatik / Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht
4. [단행본] - Paul Bergman / 1996 / Reel Justice: The Courtroom Goes to the Movies / Kansas City
5. [단행본] - Toeplitz, Jerzy / 1992 / Geschichte des Films. Band2 1928-1933 / Berlin
2. [단행본] - Henschke, Frank / 2002 / Reclams Sachlexikon des Films / Stuttgart
3. [단행본] - Kuzina, Matthias / 2000 / Der amerikanische Gerichtsfilm. Justiz, Ideologie, Dramatik / Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht
4. [단행본] - Paul Bergman / 1996 / Reel Justice: The Courtroom Goes to the Movies / Kansas City
5. [단행본] - Toeplitz, Jerzy / 1992 / Geschichte des Films. Band2 1928-1933 / Berlin
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-688-002349563