지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2013.10
- 수록면
- 241 - 244 (4page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Objective : To investigate the actual driving state of the stroke patients who had assessed CPAD.
Methods : We conducted a follow-up survey with 48 stroke patients who had assessed CPAD. First, we reviewed the medical chart and then carried out the telephone survey. The contents of the survey were driving status, experience of car accidences, driving frequency per week, the driving distances per day and the reason why they don"t driving and so on.
Results : Of the 48 subjects, 12 were driving and 36 were not driving. Current drivers" CPAD score, it was 54.13, was higher than non-drivers" CPAD score(p<0.05). Those who passed the CPAD were driving more than who failed(OR=8.3, 95%CI=1.931-35.558). Two of the current drivers were experienced car crash. One was the pass group and another was the fail group. The pass group had less car crash experienced than the fail group(OR=0.4, 95%CI=0.020-9.364).
Conclusion : The pass group of CPAD have higher chance of driving than fail group and have lower chance of car accidence than fail group. Thus we can apply the CPAD for driving cognitive evaluation tests. However, the number of subjects in this study was too small, it will need to do the study a larger subject scale with multi-institutional prospective clinical trial.
Methods : We conducted a follow-up survey with 48 stroke patients who had assessed CPAD. First, we reviewed the medical chart and then carried out the telephone survey. The contents of the survey were driving status, experience of car accidences, driving frequency per week, the driving distances per day and the reason why they don"t driving and so on.
Results : Of the 48 subjects, 12 were driving and 36 were not driving. Current drivers" CPAD score, it was 54.13, was higher than non-drivers" CPAD score(p<0.05). Those who passed the CPAD were driving more than who failed(OR=8.3, 95%CI=1.931-35.558). Two of the current drivers were experienced car crash. One was the pass group and another was the fail group. The pass group had less car crash experienced than the fail group(OR=0.4, 95%CI=0.020-9.364).
Conclusion : The pass group of CPAD have higher chance of driving than fail group and have lower chance of car accidence than fail group. Thus we can apply the CPAD for driving cognitive evaluation tests. However, the number of subjects in this study was too small, it will need to do the study a larger subject scale with multi-institutional prospective clinical trial.
목차
ABSTRACT
서론
방법
결과
고찰 및 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0