메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
신승용 (영남대학교)
저널정보
한국어문학회 어문학 語文學 第123輯
발행연도
2014.3
수록면
67 - 89 (23page)

이용수

DBpia Top 5%동일한 주제분류 기준으로
최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
On this thesis, I considered a policy of standard language. I insist to change a dichotomous thinking that standard language is superior, a dialect is inferior. And to do so, firstly, I suggested to discard <Standard language regulation> that is legalized. <Standard language regulation> may not functioned as criterion of deciding some vocabulary is standard or not, because it is not only abstract but also symbolic. Nevertheless, the regulation functions as a source of people’s recognition that people recognize that standard language is superior and a dialect is inferior. The disuse of <Standard language regulation> cannot change people"s thinking, but it is very important because the disuse of <Standard language regulation> is starting point inducing change of people’s thinking Secondly, I suggested that the way of assessing standard language need to be changed. At present, a few assessing member assess it and the national language deliberation council, is affiliated organization of Ministry of culture, sports and tourism, deliberate and decide standard language. Current way is basically closed. And it isn"t free from criticism that the nation control people’s language usage. The basic way of a policy of standard language is that the nation returns a decision of vocabulary selection to language users themselves. In this direction, dialect vocabulary that is generally communicated are accommodated greatly into standard language. As do so, a dichotomous thinking about standard language to dialect will be neutralized. And a policy of standard language needs to be changed to a policy of common language. Futhermore, a institutional strategy has to be provided to language user so that they may participate in process of lexicality.

목차

1. 서론
2. 표준어와 <표준어 규정>에 대한 비판적 검토
3. 표준어와 비표준어의 위계적 인식의 실제
4. 폐쇄적 표준어 정책의 현실과 대안
5. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-800-001371094