지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
One of the most distinguished features in Putin’s foreign policy during his third term is ‘New Eastern Policy (NEP)’ or Russia’s pivot to the Asia-Pacific region. Basically, the NEP is designed to promote development in Siberia and the Russian Far East (RFE), the most backward and isolated regions in the country. To this end, Moscow attempts to strengthen ties with Asian countries.
This paper analyzes background factors against which the New Eastern Policy has been launched, pointing to intellectual origins including Eurasianism, economic interests, geopolitical factors, and domestic factors. Then actual policies toward development of Siberia and RFE including long and mid-term development programs for this region and cooperative relations with China, Japan and Korea are scrutinized. In Northeast Asia, Moscow on the one hand has reinforced cooperative relations with China to counter-balance the U.S. in the region; on the other hand, it has been trying to develop friendly relations with Japan, South and North Korea for fear that it will be overshadowed by its giant neighbor China, a would-be superpower.
The NEP for now seems to be a two-faced phenomenon; genuine changes in policy orientation and/or just rhetoric. On the one hand, since the Putin government has repeatedly stressed the importance of the NEP with some visible actions including the establishment of the Far East and Baikal Region Development Fund, it is likely to get momentum as time passes. Yet, given that the NEP lacks in concrete implementation plan and sufficient financial resources with mounting obstacles to a favorable climate for massive investment from within and without, its feasibility is still uncertain. Therefore the success of the NEP remains to be seen for the coming years.
This paper analyzes background factors against which the New Eastern Policy has been launched, pointing to intellectual origins including Eurasianism, economic interests, geopolitical factors, and domestic factors. Then actual policies toward development of Siberia and RFE including long and mid-term development programs for this region and cooperative relations with China, Japan and Korea are scrutinized. In Northeast Asia, Moscow on the one hand has reinforced cooperative relations with China to counter-balance the U.S. in the region; on the other hand, it has been trying to develop friendly relations with Japan, South and North Korea for fear that it will be overshadowed by its giant neighbor China, a would-be superpower.
The NEP for now seems to be a two-faced phenomenon; genuine changes in policy orientation and/or just rhetoric. On the one hand, since the Putin government has repeatedly stressed the importance of the NEP with some visible actions including the establishment of the Far East and Baikal Region Development Fund, it is likely to get momentum as time passes. Yet, given that the NEP lacks in concrete implementation plan and sufficient financial resources with mounting obstacles to a favorable climate for massive investment from within and without, its feasibility is still uncertain. Therefore the success of the NEP remains to be seen for the coming years.
목차
I. 머리말
II. 2000년 이후 러시아의 대외정책 노선과 신동방정책
III. 신동방정책의 등장배경
IV. 신동방정책과 동북아
V. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (35)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 신범식 / 2013 / 푸틴 3기 러시아의 한반도정책: 변화하는 동북아에서의 적극적 역할 모색 / 한국과 국제정치 29 (1) : 123 ~ 161
2. [단행본] - 장덕준 / 2012 / 중․러관계와 한반도 / 한울
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 제성훈 / 2011 / 메드베데프 정부의 새로운 대외정책노선: 정책기조, 변화의 원인, 수행과정 분석을 중심으로 / 국제지역연구 15 (1) : 31 ~ 60
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 최태강 / 2005 / 집권 2기 푸틴정부의 러-일간 영토문제 / 슬라브硏究 21 (2) : 23 ~ 46
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 한종만 / 2012 / 러시아의 극동시베리아 개발과 한반도 정책 / 통일문제연구 24 (2) : 73 ~ 105
2. [단행본] - 장덕준 / 2012 / 중․러관계와 한반도 / 한울
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 제성훈 / 2011 / 메드베데프 정부의 새로운 대외정책노선: 정책기조, 변화의 원인, 수행과정 분석을 중심으로 / 국제지역연구 15 (1) : 31 ~ 60
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 최태강 / 2005 / 집권 2기 푸틴정부의 러-일간 영토문제 / 슬라브硏究 21 (2) : 23 ~ 46
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 한종만 / 2012 / 러시아의 극동시베리아 개발과 한반도 정책 / 통일문제연구 24 (2) : 73 ~ 105
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-300-001331173