지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2012.7
- 수록면
- 1 - 151 (151page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The community centers were established in the same shape as the present one in every town nationwide led by the government to promote the Saemaul Movement in the early 1970s. Since then, after about 40 years, there were large changes in the name and functions of the community center along with the changes in rural population and environment. But it is still used as the most important community facility in town.
Recently, as the population in rural areas has been reduced continuously and as the aging of population progressed faster than in cities, the central functions and users of the community center are changing, but its operational program and related policies and system to accept positively the changes of the community center are insufficient. This study was implemented for the purpose of suggesting a vitalization plan through research about the overall use of the community center. For the analysis on the use of the community center, we surveyed rural residents by mail for one month in June 2012 and analyzed 625 valid questionnaires to understand the factors that contribute to the users’ satisfaction level.
According to the research results, 85.5% of the towns use the facility in multiple ways as a community center and a senior citizens center. Also, as operation programs and policy supports are made focusing on elders, the function as a community space for residents has been weakened and the trend that the community hall gradually becomes a senior citizens center is vivid. The use ratio of the community center is 85.6% but when considering only the original purpose of the community center, more than 3 of 10 are in idleness. Therefore, multiple use plans should be prepared.
The elders and housewives are the main users of the community center and in 82.3% of the towns, meals are served mostly for them. The most necessary parts in providing the meals are costs and manpower. Since the public services and facilities provided to the community center are mostly for elders, there is a limitation in using the facility as a multi-purpose community center where every resident participates. It is also investigated that 6 of 10 towns have conflicts related to the management of the community center. In the survey, 82.6% of the respondents said that the community center is the only community facility and 88.8% responded that the community center is very important in town.
Accordingly, it is needed to establish the function of the community center and prepare a vitalization plan with a futuristic viewpoint reflecting the changes in rural areas. In addition, since there is no clear entity to supervise the community center administratively, a policy support system for the community center should be established. Along with these, it is needed to develop a managing and operation model for the community center to provide customized services in consideration of population, distance from downtown, and cultural environment.
Recently, as the population in rural areas has been reduced continuously and as the aging of population progressed faster than in cities, the central functions and users of the community center are changing, but its operational program and related policies and system to accept positively the changes of the community center are insufficient. This study was implemented for the purpose of suggesting a vitalization plan through research about the overall use of the community center. For the analysis on the use of the community center, we surveyed rural residents by mail for one month in June 2012 and analyzed 625 valid questionnaires to understand the factors that contribute to the users’ satisfaction level.
According to the research results, 85.5% of the towns use the facility in multiple ways as a community center and a senior citizens center. Also, as operation programs and policy supports are made focusing on elders, the function as a community space for residents has been weakened and the trend that the community hall gradually becomes a senior citizens center is vivid. The use ratio of the community center is 85.6% but when considering only the original purpose of the community center, more than 3 of 10 are in idleness. Therefore, multiple use plans should be prepared.
The elders and housewives are the main users of the community center and in 82.3% of the towns, meals are served mostly for them. The most necessary parts in providing the meals are costs and manpower. Since the public services and facilities provided to the community center are mostly for elders, there is a limitation in using the facility as a multi-purpose community center where every resident participates. It is also investigated that 6 of 10 towns have conflicts related to the management of the community center. In the survey, 82.6% of the respondents said that the community center is the only community facility and 88.8% responded that the community center is very important in town.
Accordingly, it is needed to establish the function of the community center and prepare a vitalization plan with a futuristic viewpoint reflecting the changes in rural areas. In addition, since there is no clear entity to supervise the community center administratively, a policy support system for the community center should be established. Along with these, it is needed to develop a managing and operation model for the community center to provide customized services in consideration of population, distance from downtown, and cultural environment.
목차
[표지]
[머리말]
[요약]
[ABSTRACT]
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[제1장 서론]
1. 연구의 필요성과 목적
2. 선행연구에 대한 검토
3. 연구의 범위와 방법
[제2장 농촌 마을회관 개념과 현황]
1. 마을회관의 개념과 시대적 변화
2. 마을회관 현황
3. 마을회관 관련 지원 정책
4. 마을회관 관련 주요 쟁점
[제3장 농촌 주민의 마을회관 이용 실태]
1. 이용 실태 조사 개요
2. 이용 실태 설문조사 결과
3. 마을회관의 활용도와 만족도 결정요인 분석
4. 사례 마을회관 조사 결과
5. 이용 실태 조사결과의 시사점
[제4장 마을회관 이용 활성화 방안]
1. 마을회관 운영의 문제점과 과제
2. 마을회관 이용 활성화 방향과 세부방안
[제5장 요약 및 결론]
1. 요약
2. 결론 및 정책적 제언
[부록]
[참고문헌]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
농촌마을 농특산물 포장디자인 개선을 위한 샤렛 개발 및 효과 : 참여디자이너들의 의식변화를 중심으로
채혜성
,
도경록
,
진혜련
외 4명
한국지역사회생활과학회 학술대회 자료집
2013
.04
세계 대도시의 중심지체계와 육성전략 비교 : 뉴욕, 런던, 도쿄
김선웅
,
양재섭
,
김희진
외 4명
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2017
.11
농촌 원주민과 귀농ㆍ귀촌인 간 갈등요인과 인식차이 분석 : 충남 서천군 농촌주민 및 귀농ㆍ귀촌인 특성을 사례로
유영민
,
김용근
,
안민지
농촌사회
2017
.12
복지마을 만들기의 경험과 의미 - 질적탐색
강병노
,
유영림
한국지역사회복지학
2015
.06
AHP 분석기법을 이용한 제주특별자치도 공공청사 건립사업의 평가지표 개발 - 제주특별자치도 읍·면·동 청사, 경로당, 마을회관을 중심으로 -
김한준
,
주현정
,
장명훈
대한건축학회논문집
2021
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-520-002578947