지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (3)
2015
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Darwin"s The Origin of Species seems to be completed as one systematic evolutionism by being complemented by Oparin"s The Origin of Life. However, Darwin"s evolutionism dissolved first in the Marx-Engels" materialistic conception of history, and Oparin"s evolutionism came into the world on this soil. In this way three ideas has formed in one and is called "Scientific Atheism" But the problem is that it is based on the materialism which is different from the fact. Modern materialists thinks various forms of life came out of a chunk of proteins and life is being made out of some materials by accidental chemical actions. In the view of materialist, man does not need to hold responsibility for his doings, because he has only evolved gradually from a simple cell to a complex animal. The thinking of man is only a reflection of materials, and value of human beings is meaningless. What an atheist seeks is only victory in the every day war for survival and has no other goal. As non-atheists We must hope to live in the world not like that. It is the reason that we have to criticize on the "Scientific Atheism". No matter how he changes title or theory of his thought, his action remains the same as far as it is on the basis of atheism, I was motivated to write this assertion to find grounds of criticism on "Scientific Atheism" by pursuing the process of its birth.
목차
1. 서론
Ⅱ. 공산주의 유물사관과 다윈의 진화론의 만남
Ⅲ. 엥겔스의 〈반듀링론〉 등과 오파린의〈생명의 기원〉
Ⅳ. 결론
참고자료
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-200-002573147