지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study, in order to investigate the perspectives on family communication between children and parents, had conducted a survey and after the completion of the survey analysis carried out interviews in writing targeting some of university students as children. For questionnaires, FACES III, a tool widely used for measuring family adaptability and family cohesion, was translated and used. This tool can measure the difference of ‘perspectives on everyday family conversation’, ‘perspectives on ideal family conversation’ and ‘the difference between day-to-day and ideal family conversation’, between parents and children. From 49 families with university students as their children participated in the survey, responses of 49 children, 30 fathers and 38 mothers were finally analyzed.
The analysis result on ‘family cohesion’ and ‘family adaptability’ on day-to-day and ideal conversation between parents and children was as follows: Overall, response average of parents on ‘family cohesion’ and ‘family adaptability’ was higher than that of children. The comparison of response differences between parents and children on day-to-day family conversion showed its significance in areas of ‘control’, ‘discipline‘ and ‘family adaptability average’. The comparison of response differences between parents and children on ideal family conversion showed its significance in areas of ‘emotional bonding’, ‘maintaining of family boundaries’, activity sharing and event participation’ and ‘family cohesion average’.
Next, from the analysis of response differences on participants’ day-to-day and ideal family conversation, the response differences between day-to-day and ideal family conversation in 16 questionnaires out of 20 were significant. This could be interpreted as that all participants were expected to get ready for flexibility and autonomy of communication with more securing unity and solidarity between family members than the current family conversation.
Finally, on the basis of family members’ responses, family system types were analyzed. Focused on children’s responses, classifying family communication types showed 24 balanced, 11 middle-range and 14 extreme family types. However, mother’s responses showed more middle-range than balanced family types, which means inconsistency between family members. And the result of detail investigation on how much consistent family system types of members were by family was that the consistent cases of family system type between members out of 49 families were 21 and inconsistent cases 28. Also, in the aspect of consistency between couples in family system types, there were 11 in consistent cases, more than 8 consistent cases.
The analysis result on ‘family cohesion’ and ‘family adaptability’ on day-to-day and ideal conversation between parents and children was as follows: Overall, response average of parents on ‘family cohesion’ and ‘family adaptability’ was higher than that of children. The comparison of response differences between parents and children on day-to-day family conversion showed its significance in areas of ‘control’, ‘discipline‘ and ‘family adaptability average’. The comparison of response differences between parents and children on ideal family conversion showed its significance in areas of ‘emotional bonding’, ‘maintaining of family boundaries’, activity sharing and event participation’ and ‘family cohesion average’.
Next, from the analysis of response differences on participants’ day-to-day and ideal family conversation, the response differences between day-to-day and ideal family conversation in 16 questionnaires out of 20 were significant. This could be interpreted as that all participants were expected to get ready for flexibility and autonomy of communication with more securing unity and solidarity between family members than the current family conversation.
Finally, on the basis of family members’ responses, family system types were analyzed. Focused on children’s responses, classifying family communication types showed 24 balanced, 11 middle-range and 14 extreme family types. However, mother’s responses showed more middle-range than balanced family types, which means inconsistency between family members. And the result of detail investigation on how much consistent family system types of members were by family was that the consistent cases of family system type between members out of 49 families were 21 and inconsistent cases 28. Also, in the aspect of consistency between couples in family system types, there were 11 in consistent cases, more than 8 consistent cases.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 가족 의사소통에 대한 이론적 고찰
Ⅲ. 연구 자료 수집 및 분석
Ⅳ. 가족 의사소통에 대한 구성원들의 인식 양상
Ⅴ. 제언 및 결론
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
일본의 가족 형태에 대한 연구사적 규명
일본문화연구
2015 .01
-
입시 청소년 가족을 위한 기독상담적 접근: 드라마 ‘SKY캐슬’ 가족분석을 중심으로
신학논단
2020 .09
-
러시아 가족형태 다양화와 여성의 역할 문제: 대도시 여성의 일·가족 양립 경험을 중심으로
러시아어문학연구논집
2018 .01
-
축소 가족 사회에서 교회의 가족을 위한 교육 목회
신학논단
2023 .12
-
‘1인 가구 시대’ 한국 천주교회의 가정사목 연구 - 가족 공론장의 변화와 교회의 과제를 중심으로 -
가톨릭신학
2018 .01
-
‘가족의 탄생’ - 한국 영화/드라마 속 가족 풍경을 통해 재고하는 기독교 가족의 의미
한국기독교신학논총
2021 .01
-
『이슬람 정육점』으로 본 가족의 해체와 재구성
인문사회과학연구
2016 .01
-
기획논문 : 전후 서독의 가족과 가족정책－1950∼1960년대 서독 가족정책 ‘탄생’의 역사적 배경－
서양사론
2015 .06
-
국가의 가족, 가족의 국가 — ‘조선인사조정령’을 통해 본 가족보호정책의 이중성 —
개념과 소통
2017 .01
-
한국 '근대가족'의 식민주의적 기원과 남은 유산들 - 가족법을 중심으로
역사학연구
2021 .11
-
비대면 시대의 가정공동체
인격주의 생명윤리
2021 .01
-
가족 하기(doing)와 허물기(undoing) — 냉전사적 사건으로서 혼혈인의 미국 이주와 초국적 가족 형성, 그리고 수행적 ‘가족 실천’ —
사림
2024 .01
-
대학생의 가족건강성 향상을 위한차문화치료 프로그램
차문화산업학
2018 .01
-
중년기 가족저녁식사의례의 가족역할중요도와 가족건강성 간 매개효과
차문화산업학
2018 .01
-
가족생애사문학과 기록영화에 나타난 도시개발과 불공정한 도시경험-박완서, 조경란, 강유가람의 작품을 중심으로
구보학보
2021 .12
-
이상 파상력(破像力)의 가족 파괴와 구축―가족 서사를 중심으로―
민족문화연구
2020 .01
-
宮崎駿『ハウルの動く城』にあらわれる家族?
일본학보
2022 .05
-
초연결 시대 인문사회학적 가족 연구의 방향 모색 - 국어국문학, 한국어 교육과의 접점을 통하여 -
한민족문화연구
2020 .01
-
가족의 해체와 새로운 공동체의 가능성
철학
2024 .08
-
다문화 가족상담의 현황과 목회상담적 과제
신학지남
2015 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
공감적 소통 능력 신장을 위한 화법 교육 방안 : ‘대화 함축’ 교육을 중심으로
김윤정
,
권순희
국어문학
2015
.11
1930년대 『삼천리』 소설을 통해 본 연애와 결혼 연구 -근대·전통·젠더를 중심으로
최경희
현대소설연구
2019
.09
통신효과를 고려한 미래지상체계 효과분석 시뮬레이션에 대한 연구
신선우
,
이재영
,
배성민
외 1명
신뢰성응용연구
2017
.06
A study of UGV effectiveness analysis considered with communication path-loss function
이재영
,
김종만
,
신선우
한국CDE학회 학술발표회 논문집
2016
.01
문자메시지의 이모티콘 활용에 관한 연구 : 이용 동기와 사회적 현존감의 상관성을 중심으로
황하성
,
박성복
미디어, 젠더 & 문화
2008
.04
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-374-001707031