개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
There are few works on the Korean-US relationship in 1964-1973 when the ROK combat troops participated in the Vietnam War (1964-1975). Since it was a very critical turning point in the US foreign policy, a new approach to the whole period is needed in order to examine the relationship precisely. The participation of the ROK troops in the Vietnam was a very crucial moment to improve the relationship between the ROK and the US, because the ROK government accepted American government"s request for the first time, which was a key to the US foreign policy in general, and not directly related to the Korean issue at that time. In fact, the Johnson administration provided special economic and military assistance to Korea through the Brown Memorandum in return.
However, a serious gap between the two countries was emerging due to the security crisis on the Korean Peninsula since 1966. As North Korean regime started to have a very aggressive strategy against South Korea in order to help North Vietnam, the ROK government considered a very active retaliation in order to boost ROK soldiers" morale, while American government had a different position on this. The Johnson administration did not want escalation of the crisis into another general war in Asia and wanted to concentrate on the frontline in Vietnam.
The Nixon Doctrine played a role as the final break of a honeymoon relationship between the ROK and the US, in the end. President Park himself as well as the ROK government officials were shocked at the downsize of the US forces in South Korea without prior consultation with the ROK government, which has been conducted by President Johnson in 1966. Even though the conflict was weakened during the Ford Administration, the relationship had been worsening during the Carter Administration. The relationship between the ROK and the US had a serious transition during the Vietnam War and the legacy was continued until the end of the 1970s.
However, a serious gap between the two countries was emerging due to the security crisis on the Korean Peninsula since 1966. As North Korean regime started to have a very aggressive strategy against South Korea in order to help North Vietnam, the ROK government considered a very active retaliation in order to boost ROK soldiers" morale, while American government had a different position on this. The Johnson administration did not want escalation of the crisis into another general war in Asia and wanted to concentrate on the frontline in Vietnam.
The Nixon Doctrine played a role as the final break of a honeymoon relationship between the ROK and the US, in the end. President Park himself as well as the ROK government officials were shocked at the downsize of the US forces in South Korea without prior consultation with the ROK government, which has been conducted by President Johnson in 1966. Even though the conflict was weakened during the Ford Administration, the relationship had been worsening during the Carter Administration. The relationship between the ROK and the US had a serious transition during the Vietnam War and the legacy was continued until the end of the 1970s.
목차
1. 서론
2. 한미관계의 허니문 시대
3. 한미관계의 균열
4. 닉슨 독트린과 한미 간 갈등의 재현
5. 결론
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (38)
참고문헌 신청
박정희 / 1963 / 국가와 혁명과 나 / 상문사 :121
박태균 / 2006 / 우방과 제국, 한미관계의 두 신화 / 창비 :226~255
박태균 / 2005 / 1960년대 중반 안보 위기와 제2경제론 / 역사비평 (72):250~276
홍석률 / 2012 / 분단의 히스테리-공개문서로 보는 미중관계와 한반도- / 창비 :4
Tae Gyun Park / 1960 / Beyond the Myth: Reassessing the Security Crisis in the mid 1960s in the Korean Peninsula / Pacific Affairs 82(1):93~110
박태균 / 2006 / 우방과 제국, 한미관계의 두 신화 / 창비 :226~255
박태균 / 2005 / 1960년대 중반 안보 위기와 제2경제론 / 역사비평 (72):250~276
홍석률 / 2012 / 분단의 히스테리-공개문서로 보는 미중관계와 한반도- / 창비 :4
Tae Gyun Park / 1960 / Beyond the Myth: Reassessing the Security Crisis in the mid 1960s in the Korean Peninsula / Pacific Affairs 82(1):93~110
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-390-001814308