지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한성서공회 성경원문연구 성경원문연구 제37호
- 발행연도
- 2015.10
- 수록면
- 152 - 172 (21page)
- DOI
- 10.28977/jbtr.2015.10.37.152
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In Luke 16:19-31, a rich man who was clothed in purple and fine linen died, but after his death, he was not carried to Abraham’s bosom but into the Hades. In economic perspective, most scholars interpret that the rich man liked his wealth too much that he didn’t take care of the poor man, Lazarus. This explanation has validity to a certain extent.
First, in the parable in Luke 16:1-13, the dishonest manager is related to the problem of wealth, and verse 14 also mentions the Pharisees who were lovers of money. It is therefore possible to read the whole chapter 16 with an economic point of view.
Second, Luke had to integrate the rich and the poor in their community, so he presented the eschatological ethics, i.e. if the rich does not use his wealth for the poor, he must go to the Hades.
Such understanding is however narrow. It does not consider the following requirements. First, the rich in the ancient Mediterranean-Palestinian society at the time of Jesus not only had a lot of money from today’s perspective, but were also at the top of the class structure, enjoying political power. Ancient societies were more closely associated with socio-political-economic structure than the ones of today.
Second, it did not consider the socio-cultural history aspect. Today, one can dress himself or herself freely without being conscious of his or her social class all the time. We can freely choose the shape and color of our dress. However, that was not the case in ancient societies. The color of the dress represents one’s social status in ancient societies. Purple clothes were only for those who belonged to the top of class structure, namely kings and emperors.
Third, it did not take into account the spatial structure and literary background. This parable is woven into the confrontation structure of two persons, the rich and the poor. If this parable can be understood from an economic point of view, the rich would be poor after the death, and the poor would be rich. But it is found that the rich went to the Hades, while the poor, Lazarus, went into the Abraham’s bosom. The compensation is not wealth but space: Abraham’s bosom and Hades. In Hades, the rich has no power whereas in Abraham’s bosom, Lazarus is very comfortable.
This is why the parable of Luke 16:19-31 should be interpreted from socio-political-cultural perspective. The rich was a political leader who had immense power. He was either Herodes Antipas who was a tetrarch of Galilee and Berea, or the one who executed John the baptist. God gave Antipas the power to take care of the poor and the righteous, but he became immersed in self-indulgence. He also persecuted the righteous. So he was sent into the Hades after his death. On the contrast, the poor Lazarus, symbolizing of the righteous one suffering under Antipas, was sent to Abraham’s bosom, which was the due blessing he deserved.
First, in the parable in Luke 16:1-13, the dishonest manager is related to the problem of wealth, and verse 14 also mentions the Pharisees who were lovers of money. It is therefore possible to read the whole chapter 16 with an economic point of view.
Second, Luke had to integrate the rich and the poor in their community, so he presented the eschatological ethics, i.e. if the rich does not use his wealth for the poor, he must go to the Hades.
Such understanding is however narrow. It does not consider the following requirements. First, the rich in the ancient Mediterranean-Palestinian society at the time of Jesus not only had a lot of money from today’s perspective, but were also at the top of the class structure, enjoying political power. Ancient societies were more closely associated with socio-political-economic structure than the ones of today.
Second, it did not consider the socio-cultural history aspect. Today, one can dress himself or herself freely without being conscious of his or her social class all the time. We can freely choose the shape and color of our dress. However, that was not the case in ancient societies. The color of the dress represents one’s social status in ancient societies. Purple clothes were only for those who belonged to the top of class structure, namely kings and emperors.
Third, it did not take into account the spatial structure and literary background. This parable is woven into the confrontation structure of two persons, the rich and the poor. If this parable can be understood from an economic point of view, the rich would be poor after the death, and the poor would be rich. But it is found that the rich went to the Hades, while the poor, Lazarus, went into the Abraham’s bosom. The compensation is not wealth but space: Abraham’s bosom and Hades. In Hades, the rich has no power whereas in Abraham’s bosom, Lazarus is very comfortable.
This is why the parable of Luke 16:19-31 should be interpreted from socio-political-cultural perspective. The rich was a political leader who had immense power. He was either Herodes Antipas who was a tetrarch of Galilee and Berea, or the one who executed John the baptist. God gave Antipas the power to take care of the poor and the righteous, but he became immersed in self-indulgence. He also persecuted the righteous. So he was sent into the Hades after his death. On the contrast, the poor Lazarus, symbolizing of the righteous one suffering under Antipas, was sent to Abraham’s bosom, which was the due blessing he deserved.
목차
1. 문제 제기
2. 예수 당시 1세기 팔레스틴의 사회-정치-경제적 배경
3. 예수 당시 1세기 팔레스틴의 사회-문화적 배경(복식 제도)
4. 누가복음 16:19-31의 문학적 배경
5. 결론
〈참고문헌〉(References)
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
부자와 나사로 비유와 누가의 통합시도 - 누가복음 16장 19~31절을 중심으로
신약연구
2016 .03
-
부자의 부유 관리 네 유형 비교에 관한 연구 : 누가복음을 중심으로
행복한 부자연구
2023 .12
-
아브라함 안에서
개신논집
2019 .09
-
도덕적 행위자로 기능하는 잠언의 아쉬르/부자
구약논단
2019 .12
-
부자와 거지 나사로 비유(눅 16:19-31)에서 경계선 모티브: 누가의 경계넘기 신학
신약논단
2022 .06
-
갈라디아서 3:14a절의 ‘아브라함의 복’과 그리스도
신약논단
2017 .12
-
A Diachronic Syntactic Study on The Parable of the Rich man and Lazarus - Focusing on Tense, Aspect and Modality
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2022 .11
-
누가공동체의 사회경제적 관점에서 본 청지기 비유(눅 16:1-8a)
신약논단
2019 .12
-
잃어버린 자들을 위한 복음서 - 누가복음의 기독교 사회복지적 적용
ACTS 신학저널
2015 .01
-
마가복음 10:17–31 다시 읽기 : 부자는 진정한 구도자였나?
한국기독교신학논총
2018 .10
-
『日本霊異記』に現れている異界─死者蘇生譚における冥界の表象を中心に─
日本學硏究
2016 .01
-
사도신경 “음부에 내려가사” 고백의 신학적 의의와 신앙교육적 제언
기독교교육정보
2015 .12
-
아브라함 친족 됨에 대한 수용사적인 측면에서의 연구
선교신학
2022 .02
-
누가복음 10:25-37 내러티브 읽기
신약논단
2023 .06
-
누가복음 1-2장에 나타난 주 기독론과 하나님의 나라
신약연구
2016 .03
-
구약에 나타난 자녀 없는 부부의 문제 해결 방법: 아브라함과 사라의 상속자 찾기 사례 연구(창 11:27-25:11)
구약논단
2022 .03
-
비잔티움 회화의 하데스(Hades): 그리스도의 발아래 짓밟히는 하데스 도상과 그 의미
서양중세사연구
2022 .09
-
영적 부요와 물질적 부요를 겸한 행복한 부자에 대한 전망
행복한 부자연구
2021 .06
-
아브라함 카이퍼와 한국교회
개혁논총
2020 .01
-
교차성의 정치학: 애드리언 리치의 포스트 휴머니즘 시대에 시 쓰기
영미문학페미니즘
2023 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-233-002001227