지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to examine the differences stated between Korea and Japan is the result of the Neo-Confucian acceptance process and the social characteristics of each nation.
Japan and Korea have very different social structures. The Neo-Confucian acceptance process and the social characteristics of each nation lent significantly to the differences between Korea’s and Japan’s structure of consciousness. Since Neo-Confucianism was as much a moral and political philosophy as it was a religion the extent and rate of its implementation governed the thought and behavior of each society. Zhu Xi’s family rituals and the national civil and military examinations solidified Neo-Confucianism as the dominant feature of Korean societal thought.
On the other hand, Japan’s eclectic coexistence of adopted religions and their placement of Military at the top of their social hierarchy, instead of intellectuals as in Korean society, drove Japan in a slightly different direction of social consciousness than happened in Korea. Also, most importantly, Japan’s system allowed for little upward advancement regarding status.
The societal pressures in Japan led the populace to find an occupational niche and in so doing thrive for a time individually and pass on their tradition to their progeny. Whereas, in Korea all were driven to compete in the same tests for the same coveted high status positions which created a disproportionate amount of jobs routed in abstract thought and paper pushing rather than jobs that produced tangible items or services. Most families sought out an elevated status, thus Korean social consciousness was firmly rooted in the advancement of status.
Japan and Korea have very different social structures. The Neo-Confucian acceptance process and the social characteristics of each nation lent significantly to the differences between Korea’s and Japan’s structure of consciousness. Since Neo-Confucianism was as much a moral and political philosophy as it was a religion the extent and rate of its implementation governed the thought and behavior of each society. Zhu Xi’s family rituals and the national civil and military examinations solidified Neo-Confucianism as the dominant feature of Korean societal thought.
On the other hand, Japan’s eclectic coexistence of adopted religions and their placement of Military at the top of their social hierarchy, instead of intellectuals as in Korean society, drove Japan in a slightly different direction of social consciousness than happened in Korea. Also, most importantly, Japan’s system allowed for little upward advancement regarding status.
The societal pressures in Japan led the populace to find an occupational niche and in so doing thrive for a time individually and pass on their tradition to their progeny. Whereas, in Korea all were driven to compete in the same tests for the same coveted high status positions which created a disproportionate amount of jobs routed in abstract thought and paper pushing rather than jobs that produced tangible items or services. Most families sought out an elevated status, thus Korean social consciousness was firmly rooted in the advancement of status.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. The Political System and Social Structure
Ⅲ. Neo-Confucianism and Thoughts
Ⅳ. The Political Elite: Yangban and Samurai
Ⅴ. Surnames and Marriage
Ⅵ. Descent Groups and Household (Ie) Groups
Ⅶ. Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (26)
참고문헌 신청
[단행본] - Bary, T. A. / 1985 / The Rise of Neo-Confucianism in Korea / Columbia University Press
[단행본] - Chan, Wing-tsit. / 1986 / Chu Hsi and neo-Confucianism / UniversityofHawaiiPress
[단행본] - Choe, Y. / 2000 / Sources of Korean Tradition, Vol. 2 : From the Sixteenth to the Twentieth Centuries / ColumbiaUniversityPress
[단행본] - Ch'oe YH / 2000 / Sources of Korean Tradition: Volume II: From the Sixteenth to the Twentieth Centuries / Columbia UniversityPress
[단행본] - Choi, Chae-sok. / 1965 / Nongchonsahoihak(Agricultural Sociology) / Minhosa
[단행본] - Chan, Wing-tsit. / 1986 / Chu Hsi and neo-Confucianism / UniversityofHawaiiPress
[단행본] - Choe, Y. / 2000 / Sources of Korean Tradition, Vol. 2 : From the Sixteenth to the Twentieth Centuries / ColumbiaUniversityPress
[단행본] - Ch'oe YH / 2000 / Sources of Korean Tradition: Volume II: From the Sixteenth to the Twentieth Centuries / Columbia UniversityPress
[단행본] - Choi, Chae-sok. / 1965 / Nongchonsahoihak(Agricultural Sociology) / Minhosa
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
현대 성리학 연구사에서 도원(道原) 류승국(柳承國)의 위상
한국철학논집
2019 .01
-
性理学与脱性理学关于认识主体与客体问题上的差异 ― 以朱熹与洪大容比较为中心
중국학
2018 .01
-
畿湖學派의 한문 학습 차제와 체계에 대한 연구
동방한문학
2020 .01
-
송 · 원시기 성리학과 여성 : 사대부의 구상과 ‘여성’의 부재
역사와현실
2018 .09
-
성리학으로 조선시대를 설명하는 연구 경향의 비판적 고찰
역사비평
2019 .05
-
여말선초 성리학의 수용과 그 성격
역사비평
2018 .02
-
The Relationship between Neo-Confucianism and Korean Literature
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2020 .12
-
梅月堂 金時習의 「感興詩 11수」 연구
한국문학논총
2022 .04
-
원말 의학과 유학의 결합 양상: 단계 주진형을 중심으로
의사학
2023 .12
-
省軒 李炳憙의 학문적 연원과 성리학적 특징
南冥學硏究
2024 .08
-
대구권 성리학의 학문 지형도와 특징
국학연구
2020 .07
-
한일관계, 무엇을 할 것인가?
한국여성신학
2019 .06
-
21세기 중국 ‘정치유학’의 이념과 쟁점
유학연구
2015 .11
-
The Primacy of Li (Principle) in the Neo-Confucian Philosophy of Zhu Xi: Significance for Contemporary Korean Society
Korea Journal
2019 .12
-
조선초기의 성리학적 의료관과 의료의 위상
의료사회사연구
2018 .04
-
언론을 통해 본 한일협정 인식 50년
역사비평
2015 .05
-
김시습의 사상사적 자기 모색과 <남염부주지>의 再讀 : <유금오록>과의 관련을 중심으로
고전문학연구
2023 .06
-
조선후기 성리학 이념과 실학의 제 문제
韓國史學史學報
2019 .01
-
Historical Semantics of Confucianism during the Transitional Period of Modern Korea
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2023 .06
-
14~15세기 성리학의 수용과 조선적 문명교화론의 탄생
역사비평
2018 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-913-002156451