지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The amount of the official development assistance(ODA) that Korea has made to Africa, including grants and loans, showed an unprecedented progress from the mid 2000s while the region has been newly emerging as an important partner for Korea in terms of economic and political aspects. Despite the significant and impressive growth in the quantity of ODA funding, not much detailed analysis has been done on the quality of Korea’s ODA projects in Africa. The quality of Korea’s ODA for Africa is expected to be enhanced once we identify which areas or sectors of development cooperation Korea should focus on in providing such assistance. In recognition of this growing need, this study seeks to identify the core areas of development cooperation between Korea and Africa through quantitative analysis, measuring the degree of Africa’s needs and Korea’s aid supply capacity, and draw some policy implications. For the purpose of the study, Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania, Mozambique which are primary recipient countries of Korea’s ODA were selected. The study paired the above four selected countries with a respective benchmarkable(one-step advanced) country, based on income levels and development stages for comparative analysis which, in turn, identified development needs of recipient countries. The paper then ranks priority sectors by harmonizing development needs of recipient countries and Korea’s aid capability. For example, sectors in which both the development needs of recipient countries and Korea’s aid capabilities is strong are ranked “no 1”, followed by sectors in which the development needs of recipients are high, but Korea’s aid capacity is relatively low(no.2), and then sectors in which the development needs of recipients are low, yet Korea’s aid capabilities are strong(no.3). Lastly, sectors in which both the development needs of recipients and Korea’s aid capabilities are low are placed in the ‘aid to be deferred’ category. Priority sectors(no.1) identified for all countries are water and telecommunication, which is reflecting well on the situations and challenges Africa countries face. Agriculture was measured as priority sector for Ethiopia and Kenya. As a matter of fact, there is a broad consensus that agricultural development is the key to addressing the poverty trap and initiate take-off economic development in African continent. It is because more than 90 percent of the continent’s poor population live in rural areas and depends on agriculture for their livelihood.
This study takes a sector-by-sector approach in recognition of the pressing need to improve the quality of Korea’s ODA toward Africa. Notwithstanding its motive and aim, this study has an obvious limitation in terms of the methodology it has adapted in identifying the core areas of cooperation. Follow-up research will, therefore, be necessary to provide more in-depth and scientific analysis for development cooperation between Africa and Korea.
This study takes a sector-by-sector approach in recognition of the pressing need to improve the quality of Korea’s ODA toward Africa. Notwithstanding its motive and aim, this study has an obvious limitation in terms of the methodology it has adapted in identifying the core areas of cooperation. Follow-up research will, therefore, be necessary to provide more in-depth and scientific analysis for development cooperation between Africa and Korea.
목차
1. 서론
2. 분석 방법 및 분석자료
3. 분야별 개발수요 및 공여능력 측정
4. 분석결과 : 한국의 ODA 중점분야 도출
5. 맺음말
〈참고문헌〉
Abstract
국문초록
참고문헌 (38)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Analysis of the Healthcare Sector in Africa and Its Policy Implications for Korea
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2022 .03
-
금융시장발전과 공적개발원조의 효과성: 양자간･다자간 원조를 중심으로
산경연구논집
2019 .01
-
Sectoral Determinants of Korean Development Assistance: Similar, yet Different?
Journal of Economic Development
2021 .01
-
효과적인 ODA 사업 추진을 위한 수원국 유형화와 정책적 연계
한국비교정부학보
2017 .01
-
농촌 공적개발원조 프로젝트 평가를 위한 고려 사항
한국지역개발학회지
2023 .12
-
The Spatial Econometric Analysis on Democracy and Economic Determinants of Official Development Assistance: Evidence from Korea
계량경제학보
2024 .09
-
공적개발원조(ODA)의 원조효과성과 한국 ODA에 대한 시사점
한국지역개발학회지
2016 .12
-
한국 국제개발협력과 문화 ODA
문화정책논총
2021 .04
-
한국 보건분야 Official Development Assistance (ODA) 역량강화 전략 현황분석: 질적 연구방법을 이용한 실증연구
국제개발협력
2021 .06
-
Does Korea’s official development assistance (ODA) promote its FDI?
Journal of Economic Research (JER)
2017 .01
-
공적개발원조의 선택적 편의에 대한 거버넌스 영향 분석
국제통상연구
2018 .01
-
The Aid Regime and South Korean ODA Policy and Practice: A Comparison with Japan
국제개발협력연구
2016 .01
-
한국의 아프리카 ODA 국가별 배분에서 공여국 경제적 요인의 중요성
국제지역연구
2018 .01
-
한국의 중남미 ODA와 경제협력과의 관련성 분석
중남미연구
2016 .02
-
한국 ODA의 아프리카 개발협력정책과 원조효과성
무역연구
2019 .01
-
China’s Aid to North Korea, Is It Exceptional? A Comparative Analysis with China’s Aid to Africa
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2017 .01
-
공적개발원조(ODA)가 공여국 수출, 생산 및 고용에 미치는 효과: 한국의 경우
무역연구
2020 .01
-
아프리카 ODA·FDI·수출의 경제적 효과분석
무역연구
2016 .01
-
Reassessment of South Korea 's Development Assistance
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2015 .12
-
공적개발원조 (ODA)에 있어서 효과성 측정 방법론의 적용
한국비교정부학보
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
한국의 중남미 ODA와 경제협력과의 관련성 분석
김승년
,
이상직
중남미연구
2016
.02
ODA 정책의 국내 요인 : 국내 복지정책과 ODA 정책
김석우
,
박현정
한국정치학회보
2016
.03
한국식 경제발전 경험의 현재적 결과와 ODA 시사점 : 아프리카 수원국을 사례로
황재희
,
이성우
,
조경래
한국지역개발학회지
2015
.06
「한국형 ODA 모델」 중 농림업 분야 국제협력 프로그램 심화 연구(2차년도) : 농업협동조합
박성재
한국농촌경제연구원 연구보고
2015
.12
「한국형 ODA 모델」 중 농림업 분야 국제협력 프로그램 심화 연구(2차년도) : 친환경농업
허장
한국농촌경제연구원 연구보고
2015
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-309-000810434