메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제111호
발행연도
2019.3
수록면
123 - 154 (32page)
DOI
10.35865/YWH.2019.03.111.123

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Critically examined in this article is how the outside community viewed and evaluated the history of North Korea during the Cold War period, employing a perspective to view history as a subject sometimes not only read or understood but even ‘consumed’ by the public.
It is a well known fact that since the late 1960s North Korean historiography was reshaped and even distorted to serve as an ideological tool for the North Korean leadership so that it could condone and endorse singularized dominant governing (by Kim Il Sung) and Kim’s own Juche Philosophy. North Korean historians not only integrated the personal history of Kim Il Sung into the modern and contemporary history of Korea, but also completely recomposed North Korean history with Kim’s own actions at the center of it. This is a blatant example of political power turning a mere individual (of course in this case, the one and only North Korean leader) into a historic figure, in an extremely arbitrary manner just for the good and need of the state. In other words, it is an quintessential example of “consumption of history to suit one’s need.”
However, people who have criticized North Koreans’ arbitrary consumption of Kim Il Sung’s legacy should also share the blame of conveniently consuming history at their own discretion. In this study, the travelogues of U.S. journalists who visited North Korea in the early and middle years of the 1970 when East Asia was welcoming a détente. They all wrote what they saw and heard while having a trip based on a predetermined course offered to foreigners by the North Korean government, and eventually released those writings to the press. These travelogues, written by people on both sides of the political aisle, came to serve as proxies for contenders in an ideological battle of propaganda. Things released from North Korea were reinterpreted (by the other side) based upon people’s limited knowledge of the Socialist states as well as their own preconception. North Korean historiography which featured Kim Il Sung’s life at its very center was particularly criticized. Meanwhile, South Korean press provided the public with translations of abbreviated versions of those travelogues, restricting the scope of South Korean understanding of North Korea even more, and more so than that of the U.S. On the other hand, it should also be noted that these U.S. travelogues from the 1970s led to a new breed of studies regarding Kim Il Sung’s North Korea.

목차

머리말
1. 1970년대 북한 방문 취재와 선전 대결
2. 김일성을 중심에 둔 역사 인식 경합
3. 새로운 북한관과 남한 사회의 방북기 ‘검열’
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-911-000526822