지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제111호
- 발행연도
- 2019.3
- 수록면
- 317 - 362 (46page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2019.03.111.317
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Examined in this article is how the U.S. government intervened in South Korea’s housing issue, in the wake of U.S.’ own modification of its Korean aid program during the 1970s. Intended here is to reevaluate the role such program actually played, and reexamine its very nature too. Primarily analyzed here are the contents that were changed, as well as the new objective of such program, which reveals the fact that U.S. was particularly interested in the housing issues of South Korea. Housing is still a big issue today in the Korean society, and the birth of the housing finance market in Korea seems to have been a product of a situation where U.S. Cold-war strategy and the Korean society’s domestic changes happened to cross paths. Hopefully an examination on that would provide us with a clue to the nature and goal of U.S.’ Korean relief program of the 1970s.
In the late 1960s, the U.S. government was feeling a need to modify its own foreign relief program. After President Nixon was sworn in, the U.S. government made it a point to boost efficiency in foreign aid and stabilize the 3rd World countries. During the 1970s, U.S. aimed to support stabilization of those countries while also implanting administrative institutions which would serve to enforce free market economy in the future, and that was exactly what U.S. did in South Korea in the 1970s. U.S. was especially interested in Housing issues, and by establishing institutions concerning housing finances, it intended to lay out the foundation for a ‘modernized’ market of financial capital for the very first time in Korea. In other words, while U.S. intended to stabilize the Korean society, it also intended to spread a Capitalist economic order led by the U.S. inside Korea.
U.S. aid of Korean housing played an important rule in enlarging the Korean housing market and growth of the Korean housing industry. Yet the ultimate goal of the modified aid program, the institutionalization of a housing finance market in Korea, was delayed due to a clash of interest with the South Korean government which wanted to distribute and spend resources according to its own plan and need. The development strategy of the Park Jeong-hi regime aggravated social inequality, and the Yushin system was later dismantled. The new military regime expanded customer-oriented financial support as suggested by the U.S., and promoted enhanced autonomy within the financial market as well. Construction companies which already grew to become ‘Jaebeol’ conglomerates preferred the idea of boosting the economy with said methods, and in addition wanted new effective demands to be created. In the process, the Korean population and not to mention the Korean financial market was gradually absorbed into the U.S.-led Capitalist world economy of finance, while being exposed to the nature of uncertainty, such global order most clearly manifested.
In the late 1960s, the U.S. government was feeling a need to modify its own foreign relief program. After President Nixon was sworn in, the U.S. government made it a point to boost efficiency in foreign aid and stabilize the 3rd World countries. During the 1970s, U.S. aimed to support stabilization of those countries while also implanting administrative institutions which would serve to enforce free market economy in the future, and that was exactly what U.S. did in South Korea in the 1970s. U.S. was especially interested in Housing issues, and by establishing institutions concerning housing finances, it intended to lay out the foundation for a ‘modernized’ market of financial capital for the very first time in Korea. In other words, while U.S. intended to stabilize the Korean society, it also intended to spread a Capitalist economic order led by the U.S. inside Korea.
U.S. aid of Korean housing played an important rule in enlarging the Korean housing market and growth of the Korean housing industry. Yet the ultimate goal of the modified aid program, the institutionalization of a housing finance market in Korea, was delayed due to a clash of interest with the South Korean government which wanted to distribute and spend resources according to its own plan and need. The development strategy of the Park Jeong-hi regime aggravated social inequality, and the Yushin system was later dismantled. The new military regime expanded customer-oriented financial support as suggested by the U.S., and promoted enhanced autonomy within the financial market as well. Construction companies which already grew to become ‘Jaebeol’ conglomerates preferred the idea of boosting the economy with said methods, and in addition wanted new effective demands to be created. In the process, the Korean population and not to mention the Korean financial market was gradually absorbed into the U.S.-led Capitalist world economy of finance, while being exposed to the nature of uncertainty, such global order most clearly manifested.
목차
머리말
1. 1960년대 후반 주택문제의 심화와 한·미 정부의 개발전략
2. 한·미 정부의 상반적 주택정책 방침과 주택자금 수요 주체의 재편
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
1960년대 후반 서울시 주택정책과 ‘중산층’문제 인식
한국사연구
2016 .12
-
1920년대 조선총독부의 주택정책과 공영주택의 관사 전용
한국사학보
2021 .05
-
Evolution of Public Housing Policy in Korea: From Distribution to Rental Housing
Journal of Contemporary Korean Studies
2016 .08
-
1930년대 조선총독부의 주택금융 도입과 도시금융조합의 자금 운용
한국사연구
2022 .09
-
총동원체제기(1938~45년) 조선총독부 공영주택정책의 운영 실태와 조선인의 주변화 - 부영주택(府營住宅)을 중심으로
역사와경계
2021 .09
-
중국의 주택수급요인 변화성에 관한 연구
중국학논총
2021 .12
-
미국 대외원조와 대한(對韓)원조의 군사화(軍事化)－제2차 세계대전 이후부터 한국전쟁 시기를 중심으로－
사이間SAI
2020 .01
-
외국인노동자의 주거환경이 주거만족도에 미치는 영향- 연령별 비교를 중심으로-
재외한인연구
2024 .08
-
부산지역의 인구구성 및 가구특성변화에 따른 주택수요예측에 관한 연구 -동･서쪽을 중심으로-
인문사회과학연구
2020 .01
-
5.16군사정부기 미 대한원조정책의 성격과 AID-유솜의 역할 : 초기 울산공업단지 건설과정을 중심으로
역사와현실
2017 .09
-
1990년대 중국 주택제도 개혁과 도시 기득권의 확립 : 상하이시 사례를 중심으로
역사비평
2016 .08
-
자산과 소득이 주택가격 전망에 미치는 영향 분석
인문사회과학연구
2023 .08
-
부평 미쓰비시(三菱)사택의 도시주거로서의 특징과 가치 - 1930년대 말 부평의 병참기지화와 노무자주택의 건설
도시연구
2019 .10
-
중국의 부동산 정책과 주택가격 거품 발생의 원인
중국학논총
2023 .03
-
Exclusive Pakkey and Multidimensionality
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2022 .11
-
The magnitude of articulatory gestures for the glide /w/ in Korean: Implications for the phonological representation of /w/
음성음운형태론연구
2020 .12
-
Exhaustivity of –(n)un in Korean
한국언어학회 학술대회지
2017 .06
-
재일동포사회를 통해서 본 한국다문화사회의 비판적 고찰
일본문화학보
2016 .02
-
1910년대 미국의 한국에 대한 인식과 3.1운동에 대한 반응
역사와실학
2021 .04
-
1953~1955년 아이젠하워 행정부의 상호안전보장계획(MSP)과 대한(對韓) ‘평시(平時) 군사원조’의 재개
사림
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-911-000526766