메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국외국어대학교 법학연구소 외법논집 외법논집 제34권 제3호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
165 - 176 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In order to reflect the general public's sound common sense in setting sentencing and to realize fair and objective sentencing that the people could trust, the Supreme Court provided groundwork regulations for the Sentencing Committee in the 2007 Supreme Court Organizational Act. The first committee held in May 7, 2009 proclaimed sentencing guidelines for eight major crimes - murder, bribery, sex crimes, robbery, embezzlement, malpractice, perjury, and false incrimination. These guidelines will be applied to criminal cases beginning in July of 2009. Establishment of such sentencing guidelines not only relieves inequities in sentencing terms but also allows for the people to observe the process of establishing sentencing terms, thereby promoting the realization of justice in criminal law. The existing Sentencing Committee's sentencing guidelines prescribe sentencing factors on each crime. When examining sentencing factor on each crime, these factors draw conclusions on the crimes in some cases but in some cases, they are not, although according to the regulatory perspective, they are the common sentencing factors. Therefore, there would be some problems under the current sentencing guidelines since both of the procedure of sentencing and the evaluation of sentencing may differ in each case. This can cause the problems of transparency and equality in sentencing. In order to solve this problem, this article intends to scrutinize sentencing factors from the judicial decision-making perspectives and to establish groundwork for the common sentencing factors. In addition, this article will research on the United States Sentencing Commission Guidelines Manual, Chapter 3 (Adjustments) Part A, B, C, D, and E, which is about the common sentencing factor, applicable to almost all crimes, such as the adjustments on victims, crime roles, obstructions to justice, conflicts in laws, and liability recognition. It will also study on the sentencing factors in the UK Criminal Justice Act 2003 Part 12 - Sentencing Section 142~146, Section 166, which is the model for the Korean provision (this UK law includes aggravate or mitigating sentencing factor), and on the Overarching Principles; Seriousness which was announced in December 2004, thereby introducing a common sentencing factor for the Korean jurisdiction. Through introducing this common sentencing factor from the research, this article aims at producing the common sentencing factor among the existing sentencing factors in the Korean sentencing guidelines. This will eventually help the second Sentencing Committee to examine abduction, larceny, fraud, forgery, obstruction of justice, and narcotic crimes, thereby making sentencing factors that do not conflict each other in crimes respectively. This will further create the public's trust and will also enhance equality and appropriateness of sentencing in each crime under the sentencing guidelines.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0