메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한이비인후과학회 대한이비인후-두경부외과학회지 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학 제59권 제4호
발행연도
2016.1
수록면
293 - 299 (7page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background and Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic utility of ultrasound (US)-guided core-needle biopsy (CNB) (US-CNB) performed by a head and neck surgeon for mass lesions with inconclusive result in previous fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). Subjects and Method Forty six patients who had previously inconclusive results of non-diagnostic specimen, undetermined significance, and malignancy/suspicious malignancy with undetermined subtype were included in the study. They were divided into the repeating FNAC (rFNAC) group and CNB groups. Procedure time, success of targeting, and complications were evaluated in the CNB group. In addition, the diagnostic utility of CNB was compared with that of FNAC. Results US-CNB was successfully completed by a head and neck surgeon in all 23 cases without any major complications. The US-CNB group showed significantly lower rates of repeated non-diagnostic/undetermined results than in the rFNAC group (0% vs. 40.9%, p=0.001). In addition, CNB provided specific pathological diagnoses that permitted the surgeon to establish an appropriate treatment plan in 95.7% (22/23) of the CNB group, while rFNAC provided specific pathological diagnoses in 56.5% (13/23) of the rFNAC group (p=0.002). Conclusion US-CNB can be performed safely by head and neck surgeons, providing better diagnostic results compared with those of rFNAC for mass lesions with inconclusive results in previous FNAC. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2016;59(4):293-9

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (18)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0