메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
연세대학교 의과대학 Yonsei Medical Journal Yonsei Medical Journal 제56권 제6호
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
1,559 - 1,565 (7page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: Colonoscopic polypectomy and surveillance are important to prevent colorectal cancer and identify additional relativerisk factors for adequate surveillance. In this study, we evaluated risk factors related to recurrent high-risk polyps during the surveillanceof patients with high-risk polyps. Materials and Methods: We included 434 patients who had high-risk polyps (adenoma ≥10 mm, ≥3 adenomas, villous histology,or high-grade dysplasia) on the baseline colonoscopy and underwent at least one surveillance colonoscopy from 2005 to 2011 atSeverance Hospital. Data regarding patient characteristics, bowel preparation and polyp size, location, number, and pathologicaldiagnosis were retrospectively collected from medical records. Patients with recurrent high-risk polyps were compared with patientswith low-risk or no polyps during surveillance. Results: Patients were predominantly male (77.4%), with a mean age of 61.0±8.6 years and mean follow-up of 1.5±0.8 years. Highriskpolyps recurred during surveillance colonoscopy in 51 (11.8%) patients. Results of multivariate analysis showed that malegender, poor bowel preparation, and a larger number of adenomas were independent risk factors for recurrent high-risk polyps(p=0.047, 0.01, and <0.001, respectively). Compared with high-risk polyps found during initial colonoscopy, high-risk polyps onsurveillance colonoscopy had higher proportions of small adenomas, low-risk pathology, and fewer adenomas overall, but therewas no difference in location. Conclusion: Male patients and those with poor bowel preparation for colonoscopy or higher numbers of adenomas were morelikely to experience recurrent high-risk polyps.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (24)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0