메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중앙대학교 법학연구원 法學論文集 法學論文集 제40권 제2호
발행연도
2016.1
수록면
365 - 397 (33page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Recently entering a new era of digital mobile, concerns have actively led to how far the legal rights related to the posting contained information which has a person published as well as various articles and photographs posted by the person could be admitted. Offline/Online boundaries are blurred in media resources contained information that defines the personal life, so we met more complicated situation to determine individual rights for online posting. In the early Internet era, freedom of expression was a big buzzword, but now attention has been paid to the right to be forgotten on the Internet as sea of ​​information. The Republic of Korea has already a well-structured meshes of the law than abroad to remedy the personal rights and defamation by law such as Article 21 paragraph 4 of the Constitution, Article 70 of the Information & Communications Network Act, Article 307 of Criminal Law ‘Defamation’ and Article 309 ‘Libel by set of publications’, and Article 311 ‘Contempt’, Provisions of civil defamation damages, the Press Arbitration Act, the Public Official Election Act, the deliberations of the Korea Communications Standards Commission, and Supreme Court’s Precedents. In addition, Article 44 the Second, Article 44 the Third of the Information & Communications Network Act are provided to the temporary blinding of posts to ensure the self-regulation of the private sector by law. This writing is paid attention to the situation disputed as a kind of transformed droit including the redemption of reputational damage when it enlarged as a remedy for the damage against the overall personal rights infringement individuals due to the press articles, on the other hand, discussions related to the right to be forgotten triggered in Europe are given shape to a droit like the Claim for deleting search focused on privacy protection. By looking at the existing regulations in Korea, it would be reviewed the validity of the right to exclude access in the guideline currently promoted by the Korea Communications Commission. In short, at the current time presented the guideline by the Korea Communications Commission, the guideline related to the right to exclude access which stipulates in the text as the right to be forgotten is most likely to bring the effectiveness that is not much different from side effects of temporary blinding of posts on the Information & Communications Network Act. All problems are existed that regulations which are initiated by the logic to solve defined as a sort of legal rights before the punishment for defamation, therefore, in order to mitigate such adverse effects, legislators must be made a legislative choice that specify the responsibilities after a temporary blinding of posts when the right to exclude access clearly established by adding Articles or Clauses in the provisions of temporary blinding on the Information & Communications Network Act for leveraging existing systems after, or that delete the provisions of temporary blinding on the Information & Communication Network Act and, at the same time the right to be forgotten recognized as the rights that derive from fundamental rights or the fundamental rights, evolve as a special act by stipulating the responsibilities of the right to exclude access from the guideline. Because it is also not the system that must be considered in the scope of criminal regulations. Naturally promoting that the right to be forgotten is the droit cannot be exercised by ignoring others’ rights will also need to be continued.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0