메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한소화기내시경학회 Clinical Endoscopy Clinical Endoscopy 제52권 제4호
발행연도
2019.1
수록면
347 - 352 (6page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background/Aims: To compare the performance of latest commercially available endoscopic ultrasound biopsy needles. Methods: Six latest commercially available needles were tested on a freshly harvested bovine liver; the tested needles included three19 G, one 20 G, and two 22 G needles. Five biopsies were performed per needle with 10 mL of wet suction. The primary outcome wasthe number of complete portal tracts (CPTs) per needle aspirate. The secondary outcomes were the mean specimen length and meanfragment length. Analysis of variance and Tukey’s test were applied. Results: All 19 G needles and the 20 G needle yielded similar mean CPTs and were superior to the SharkCore 22 G needle (p<0.001adjusted for multiplicity). There was no statistically significant difference in total specimen length among the three 19 G needles and the20 G needle tested. The two 22 G needles performed similarly with respect to the number of CPTs, mean fragment length, and meanspecimen length (adjusted p=0.07, p=0.59, and p=0.10, respectively). Conclusions: The specimen adequacy was similar among the 3 latest commercially available 19 G needles. The endoscopist may choosea larger-bore needle based on availability without concerns of specimen adequacy. Further studies are needed to assess the ease ofneedle use in various anatomical locations and to confirm the optimal needle design.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0