메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
ObjectiveThe risk factors, clinical trends, and maternal and fetal health of early- and late-onset preeclampsia have not beenadequately studied. We examined the effects of early- and late-onset preeclampsia on maternal and perinataloutcomes as well as the known risk factors of preeclampsia. MethodsOne hundred and fifty women with preeclampsia were consecutively enrolled in each group. Those who developedpreeclampsia before 34 weeks of gestation were identified as having early-onset preeclampsia, while those whodeveloped at 34 weeks or later were identified as having late-onset preeclampsia. Maternal and perinatal outcomeswere compared between groups. ResultsCompared with the late-onset group, the early-onset group had higher rates of abruptio placentae (16% vs. 7.3%;P=0.019), but there was no intergroup difference in the composite maternal outcomes. A significantly higher numberof women with early-onset preeclampsia developed severe features during the disease course, and most requiredtreatment with antihypertensive drugs. Late-onset preeclampsia was more prevalent among primigravid mothers. Babies born to mothers with early-onset preeclampsia had a significantly higher rate of adverse outcomes. ConclusionThese study findings indicate that women with early-onset preeclampsia had more adverse outcome than those withlate-onset preeclampsia, but the difference was not statistically significant. There were more babies with adverseperinatal outcomes in the early-than late-onset group.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0