메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국하이데거학회 현대유럽철학연구 현대유럽철학연구 제55호
발행연도
2019.1
수록면
175 - 214 (40page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Theodor Adorno in his lecture on moral philosophy in 1963 declared the state of moral philosophy at present as practically bankrupt. About two decades before that, in Dialectic of Enlightenment, which he co-wrote with Max Horkheimer, morality itself is nullified before the all-out, self-critical, destructive force of the Enlightenment reason. This paper examines Adorno's reading of Nietzsche in light of his prognosis of the impotence of moral philosophy. In the 1963 lecture on moral philosophy, Adorno presents Thus Spoke Zarathustra as a recent example of moral philosophy's failure. In Dialectic of Enlightenment, Nietzsche is grouped together with Kant and Sade — "dark writers of the bourgeoisie" — and presented to have led, under the banner of scientific rationality, the Enlightenment's demolition of morality and moral philosophy. This paper suggests Adorno's view on the impossibility of moral philosophy has to do with his narrow, tendentious reading of Nietzsche. Gaston Bachelard's reading of Nietzsche is discussed, as one way of reading him differently. Bachelard reads Nietzsche as an innovative moral philosopher, who reconceived moral philosophy in uniquely naturalistic terms. A Nietzscheanly recast, naturalistic moral philosophy is a road not taken for moral philosophy in Adorno's thought.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0