지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper identifies problems of the existing theories with the classification of modal adverbs based on formal concord phenomenon, and redefines them first as adverbs modifying “proposition+mood,” which constitutes a sentence, and also identifies them as adverbs that fall into the category of “ji” defined by Tokieda. Building on these new methodologies, this paper considers whether adverbs previously assumed by many scholars as modal adverbs meet the new criteria of modal adverb and reclassifies them as follows:
(1) While 「全然(zenzen)」 「決して(kessite)」 are supposed to be classified as modal adverbs based on the correspondence with negative expressions, 「全然(zenzen)」is redefined as a degree adverb because it modifies the stativity of 「predicate+ない(nai)」 and implies the meaning of degree by itself. In contrast, 「決して(kessite)」 modifies “proposition+mood” which forms a sentence by itself and also corresponds to “ji” by Tokieda in its linguistic nature. Thus, it is classified as a quasi-modal adverb since some of the examples are included in phrases modifying nouns, even though it has characteristics of a modal adverb.
(2) The words 「もちろん(mochiron)」 「むろん(muron)」 「事実(jijitsu)」 「実際(jissai)」 modify propositions and do not have the characteristics of Tokieda’s “ji.” Also, they simply represent an narrator’s annotation to what is being described. Therefore, they can be identified as annotative adverbs.
(3) 「なぜ(naze)」 and 「どうして(dousite)」 modify propositions, and the focus of inquiry shifts when they are added to a sentence, which disqualify them as a modal adverb. Instead, they are classified as interrogative adverbs.
(4) 「おそらく(osoraku)」 and 「たぶん(tabun)」 modify “proposition+mood” that constitutes a setence corresponding with diverse modal expressions, and this qualifies them as “ji” as well as modal adverbs. Yet, as some of the examples are included in phrases modifying nouns, they should be defined as quasi-modal adverbs.
(5) 「どうぞ(douzo)」 and 「どうか(douka)」 modify request sentences and have the linguistic nature of Tokieda’s “ji.” Also, none of the examples is contained in phrases modifying nouns, which qualifies them as modal adverbs.
(1) While 「全然(zenzen)」 「決して(kessite)」 are supposed to be classified as modal adverbs based on the correspondence with negative expressions, 「全然(zenzen)」is redefined as a degree adverb because it modifies the stativity of 「predicate+ない(nai)」 and implies the meaning of degree by itself. In contrast, 「決して(kessite)」 modifies “proposition+mood” which forms a sentence by itself and also corresponds to “ji” by Tokieda in its linguistic nature. Thus, it is classified as a quasi-modal adverb since some of the examples are included in phrases modifying nouns, even though it has characteristics of a modal adverb.
(2) The words 「もちろん(mochiron)」 「むろん(muron)」 「事実(jijitsu)」 「実際(jissai)」 modify propositions and do not have the characteristics of Tokieda’s “ji.” Also, they simply represent an narrator’s annotation to what is being described. Therefore, they can be identified as annotative adverbs.
(3) 「なぜ(naze)」 and 「どうして(dousite)」 modify propositions, and the focus of inquiry shifts when they are added to a sentence, which disqualify them as a modal adverb. Instead, they are classified as interrogative adverbs.
(4) 「おそらく(osoraku)」 and 「たぶん(tabun)」 modify “proposition+mood” that constitutes a setence corresponding with diverse modal expressions, and this qualifies them as “ji” as well as modal adverbs. Yet, as some of the examples are included in phrases modifying nouns, they should be defined as quasi-modal adverbs.
(5) 「どうぞ(douzo)」 and 「どうか(douka)」 modify request sentences and have the linguistic nature of Tokieda’s “ji.” Also, none of the examples is contained in phrases modifying nouns, which qualifies them as modal adverbs.
목차
〈Abstract〉
1. 들어가기
2. 종래의 진술부사에 대한 재 고찰
3. 맺는말
참고문헌
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (13)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
사용역에 따른 양태 부사의 목록 선정과 등급화 연구-구어성과 문어성의 정도를 중심으로-
언어와 문화
2024 .08
-
체언 수식 부사에 대한 연구
국어문학
2020 .07
-
≪釋迦如來十地修行記≫ 부사 연구
중국어문논총
2021 .08
-
진술부사에 관한 일고찰(1) - 「もし」「万一」「きっと」를 중심으로 -
일어일문학
2020 .05
-
일상대화에서 중국어 정도부사 연용 현상
담화와인지
2024 .11
-
구어 사용역에 따른 한국어 교육용 부사의 사용 양상－고빈도 부사 18개를 중심으로－
인문학연구
2016 .01
-
Adverb Positions in Korean EFL learners’ Interlanguage
영어영문학21
2022 .12
-
중국어권 한국어 학습자의 부사 사용에 대한 연구
언어사실과 관점
2019 .01
-
현대중국어 양상부사 연구 - 양상부사의 특징, 범위, 하위분류를 중심으로
중국어문학논집
2022 .10
-
The Distribution of Noun-Modifying Adverbs in English
영어학
2021 .01
-
한국어 명사류 품사와 부사의 통용 현상에 대하여
우리말연구
2022 .01
-
구동사의 부사위치에 따른 음향음성학적 연구: 부사를 중심으로
신영어영문학
2021 .08
-
A Study on Translating Performance in the Adverbs with Two Forms and Different Meanings
통번역교육연구
2019 .01
-
기계번역에서 나타나는 정도부사 처리양상에 관한 일고찰 －일한번역을 중심으로－
일본연구
2023 .08
-
汉语口语中的副词后置现象及生成动因探讨
중국언어연구
2018 .01
-
한국인 중국어 학습자의 추측 어기부사 습득 양상 분석
중국어문학논집
2021 .06
-
繰り返しでつくられた副詞の形式的特徴をめぐって
日本語敎育
2022 .12
-
Acoustic Interactions between Vowel Duration and Intensity depending on Position of Adverbs in Phrasal Verbs in English
영어영문학21
2022 .03
-
A Cognitive Comparative Analysis on Adverbs Related with COMPLETENESS
담화와인지
2018 .02
-
영한번역에서의 부사 하위 유형에 따른 품사 대응과 변환에 관한 연구
언어학 연구
2019 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-830-001124456