메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김미나 (고려대학교)
저널정보
한국기후변화학회 한국기후변화학회지 Journal of Climate Change Research Vol.11 No.5-2
발행연도
2020.10
수록면
481 - 499 (19page)
DOI
10.15531/ksccr.2020.11.5.481

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study investigated the private sector’s climate change risk, focusing on the financial sector and its risk management, specifically the case of the water industry in Korea. The water industry tends to be particularly vulnerable to climate change and requires adaptation strategies to address potential risks. This study quantified the potential financial risk to the water industry from four extreme weather events: heat waves, cold waves, heavy rain and heavy snow. These events are classified according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) scenarios, RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5, using a business decision supporting tool, the Climate Change Risk Assessment System (CRAS), which was developed by Korea Environment Institute. The results of analysis revealed that small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are more vulnerable in responding to climate change risk than large enterprises, that SME manufacturers in particular are the most vulnerable in responding to climate change risk. Of heat waves, cold waves, heavy rain and heavy snow, the greatest climate change-related financial risk was from heat waves. Lost sales due to climate change risk ranged from 152.9 to 210.7 billion won per year on average, according to the RCP 4.5 scenario. Furthermore, when the RCP 8.5 scenario was considered, the scale of financial risk increased to between 250.9 and 345.8 billion won per year. This study provides quantitative information that helps to increase awareness on the financial risks of the water industry from climate change and to explore measures for business adaptation.

목차

ABSTRACT
1. 서론
2. 문헌 조사
3. 분석 방법
4. 분석결과
5. 결론
Reference

참고문헌 (36)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-453-001560260