메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
배동학 이한나 (양지마을 도시재생지원센터) 김승희 (강원대학교)
저널정보
한국주거환경학회 주거환경 住居環境 통권 제19권 제1호 (통권 제51호)
발행연도
2021.3
수록면
307 - 320 (14page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study empirically analyzed the subjective concept of residential welfare workers" perception of residential welfare by applying the Q methodology to residential welfare workers.
The perception of residential welfare of residential welfare workers was derived into four types. The first type is the physical housing environment improvement type, the second type is the residential welfare policy support type, the 3 type is the broader type of housing service support type, and the 4 type is the realization type of residential welfare to guarantee the right to live.
This classification seems to have been derived from differences in perception of the concept of residential welfare and the scope of services. The types were classified according to whether the concept of residential welfare was recognized as a consensus (type 2) or a broad sense (type 4). In addition, it was classified according to whether the scope of residential services is limited to physical facility improvement (type 1), and whether it includes counseling, discovery, psychological, and emotional services for the vulnerable (types 3). It is judged that individuals" perceptions differ depending on the degree of understanding and performance of the work of the residential welfare worker. Considering that residential welfare work is a means of improving housing stability and housing standard from a long-term perspective, it is necessary to expand the awareness of housing welfare workers in a broad sense.
Residential welfare workers include physical housing services and economic housing services, but the concept of living services that can maintain the convenience of life is not included in the scope of work. Accordingly, it is necessary to raise awareness of overall residential welfare work. In addition, since the practice of welfare work or problem-solving may appear differently for each difference in perception, education and action plans for enhancing professionalism should be changed.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 고찰
Ⅲ. 연구방법
Ⅳ. 연구결과
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-595-001616000