메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
洪允姬 (延世大學校)
저널정보
중국어문학연구회 중국어문학논집 中國語文學論集 第128號
발행연도
2021.6
수록면
205 - 229 (25page)
DOI
10.25021/JCLL.2021.6.128.205

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In its pursuit of present-facing mythology, recent scholarship on Chinese mythology is displaying an inclination to concentrate on the discussion of the transformation of myth resources. Yet, it is in fact from the early 21st century that the concept of “myth resources” appeared and began to be actively discussed. This was around the time Chinese government turned its eyes towards the traditional culture and intangible cultural heritage as the resources for developing cultural industry. New light was shed on folk culture and folk literature as intangible cultural heritage and a form of cultural resources; and it is right about this time that myth was beginning to be viewed as a repository of resources. This paper examines the beginning of the discussion on “myth resources” in the 21st-century Chinese academia, its social background, relationship between academic journals and state policies, and the actual details of the discussion that went on between them, by focusing primarily on the discussion of “myth resources” that took place in the “Mythology” special feature section for the Journal of Yangtze University in 2006. Through this, it could be confirmed that the beginning of the discussion on “myth resources” is closely connected to the logic of cultural industry and explosion of enthusiasm to preserve “intangible cultural heritage” as China engaged in globalization and the system of UNESCO intangible cultural heritage. In addition, what was uncovered in this process is that focus of “myth resources” discussion in this context is not placed on examining the resourcization of myths from a critical perspective, but more on explaining the imperatives for transforming (or utilizing) them. However, scholarship on mythology at this point needs to contemplate more on and caution about the side effects of myth resourcization from a critical standpoint, including the alienation of agent of myth transmission, alienation of myth itself, and the territorialization of academic knowledge.

목차

1. 들어가는 말
2. 무형문화유산과 문화자원으로서의 신화
3. 2006년 『長江大學學報』 신화학 칼럼의 시작과 신화자원 토론
4. 신화의 자원화와 신화학의 영토화
5. 나오는 말
參考文獻
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (26)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-820-001866231