Synthesis, Microstructures and Mechanical Behaviour of Cr0.21Fe0.20Al0.41Cu0.18 and Cr0.14Fe0.13Al0.26Cu0.11Si0.25Zn0.11 Nanocrystallite Entropy Alloys Prepared by Mechanical Alloying and Hot-Pressing

Yaser A. Alshataif; S. Sivasankaran; Fahad A. Al‑Mufadi; Abdulaziz S. Alaboodi; H. R. Ammar

추천

검색

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: Yaser A. Alshataif (Qassim University) S. Sivasankaran (Qassim University) Fahad A. Al‑Mufadi (Qassim University) Abdulaziz S. Alaboodi (Qassim University) H. R. Ammar (Qassim University)

저널정보: 대한금속·재료학회 Metals and Materials International Metals and Materials International Vol.27 No.1

발행연도: 2021.1

수록면: 139 - 155 (17page)

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

Four component Cr0.21Fe0.20Al0.41Cu0.18medium entropy alloy (Quaternary, 4C-MEA) and six componentCr0.14Fe0.13Al0.26Cu0.11Si0.25Zn0.11high entropy alloy (sexinary, 6C-HEA) were designed and developed in non-equiatomicratio to attain improved mechanical properties. These 4C-MEA, and 6C-HEA were synthesized via mechanical alloying(MA), and consolidated by hot pressing (HPing) at 723 K. For comparison, the same atomic ratio of four and six componentsof coarse grain alloys (4C-CGA and 6C-CGA) were also manufactured by conventional blending method. Nanocrystallitesize powders of 27 ± 5.20 nm and 38 ± 3.7 nm were achieved for 4C-MEA and 6C-HEA respectively after 20 h MA. Thephase evolutions, structural properties, and powder surface morphologies were characterized using X-ray diffraction andseveral electron microscopes. The 4C-MEA has possessed more quantity of body centred cubic (BCC) and less amountof face centred cubic (FCC) phases due to the more solid dissolution of 4 components. However, 6C-HEA exhibited morequantity of FCC and a small amount of BCC phases due to the incorporation of more FCC components compared to 4C-MEAand less solid dissolution due to more atomic radius difference among the mixing elements (atomic radius of Cr = 166 pm,Fe = 156 pm, Al = 118 pm, Cu = 145 pm, Si = 111 pm and Zn = 142 pm). The HPed samples produced ultra-fine crystallitesize of 177 nm and 499 nm for 4C-MEA and 6C-HEA respectively. Further, 4C-MEA and 6C-HEA exhibited the ultimatecompressive strength (UCS) of 365 MPa and 456 MPa respectively due to dissolution and lattice distortion of mixing elements. Also, 6C-HEA possessed Vickers hardness strength of around 1.97 GPa which was 2 times higher than 4C-MEA. The theoretical background of various strengthening mechanisms, various physicochemical, thermodynamic parameters, andfour core effects behind the improved properties in entropy alloys was discussed and reported. The dislocation strengtheningand solid solution strengthening were the major factors in exhibiting more UCS in 4C-MEA and 6C-HEA than 4C-CGAand 6C-CGA.

#Alloy design · High-entropy alloy · Structural properties · Characterization · Mechanical properties

참고문헌 (41)

참고문헌 신청

G.E. Totten / 2004 / Hand Book of Mechanical Alloy Design / Marcel Dekker Inc

S. Mohanty / 2017 / Ageing behaviour of equiatomic consolidated Al20Co20Cu20Ni20Zn20 high entropy alloy / Mater. Charact 129:127~134

C. Y. Hsu / 2004 / Wear resistance and high-temperature compression strength of FCC CuCoNiCrAl0.5Fe alloy with boron addition / Metall. Mater. Trans. A 35(A):1465~1469

J.W. Yeh / 2007 / Novel alloy concept, challenges and opportunities of high-entropy alloys, in Frontiers in the Design of Materials, ed. by B. Raj / CRC Press :31~47

B. Cantor / 2004 / Microstructural development in equiatomic multicomponent alloys / Mater. Sci. Eng. A 375?377:213~218

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!