지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2022.2
- 수록면
- 131 - 159 (29page)
- DOI
- 10.35227/HYLR.2022.2.33.1.131
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Since the enactment of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act in 1963, industrial accident compensation insurance has continuously developed in the direction of strengthening the level of coverage for compensation benefits. However, as industrial accident insurance has continued to develop over the past 50 years, the benefit system is under pressure from fundamental system changes since the 2000s. Matters that require fundamental system change are being raised not only in benefit, but in all areas such as the scope of application, standards for recognition of work-related accidents, and finance.
The purpose of this paper is to review the normative principles of the survivor"s compensation annuity system to prevent the discussion of improvement from drifting without principle among those who have a vested interest in the improvement of the survivors compensation annuity system among those who have a vested interest in the reform of the survivors compensation annuity system among the tasks for restructuring the workers" compensation insurance. This paper attempts to derive normative principles from the Constitution. If the principles governing the formation of social insurance, industrial accident insurance, and survivors" compensation annuity systems can be found in the Constitution, important guidelines for improvement legislation can be presented, along with the normative justification and rationale for reforming the survivors" compensation annuity system.
As a result of the review, the following points were confirmed. First, the right to compensate or guarantee income of the bereaved family of the deceased worker is included in the right to work under Article 32 of the Constitution and to receive compensation or guarantee from the right to a humane livelihood under Article 34. Second, the right to receive the survivor"s compensation annuity should be improvemed in a way that can substantially compensate for the economic deficits incurred to the bereaved family who shared a living or supported by the income of the deceased worker. Third, it is necessary to promote system improvement based on the fact that the right to receive the survivor"s compensation annuity is an independent right of each bereaved family who shared a living or supported by the income of the deceased worker.
The purpose of this paper is to review the normative principles of the survivor"s compensation annuity system to prevent the discussion of improvement from drifting without principle among those who have a vested interest in the improvement of the survivors compensation annuity system among those who have a vested interest in the reform of the survivors compensation annuity system among the tasks for restructuring the workers" compensation insurance. This paper attempts to derive normative principles from the Constitution. If the principles governing the formation of social insurance, industrial accident insurance, and survivors" compensation annuity systems can be found in the Constitution, important guidelines for improvement legislation can be presented, along with the normative justification and rationale for reforming the survivors" compensation annuity system.
As a result of the review, the following points were confirmed. First, the right to compensate or guarantee income of the bereaved family of the deceased worker is included in the right to work under Article 32 of the Constitution and to receive compensation or guarantee from the right to a humane livelihood under Article 34. Second, the right to receive the survivor"s compensation annuity should be improvemed in a way that can substantially compensate for the economic deficits incurred to the bereaved family who shared a living or supported by the income of the deceased worker. Third, it is necessary to promote system improvement based on the fact that the right to receive the survivor"s compensation annuity is an independent right of each bereaved family who shared a living or supported by the income of the deceased worker.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 노동법상 유족급여제도의 개관 및 특징
Ⅲ. 사용자의 유족보상책임에 관한 헌법적 원리
Ⅳ. 산재보험의 유족보상연금에 관한 헌법적 원리
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
산업재해보상보험법상의 행정입법의 한계ㅡ유족보상연금 수급자격자의 범위를 중심으로
경희법학
2021 .09
-
산재보험법의 경계석 고쳐 세우기
노동법학
2015 .06
-
산업재해보상보험법 제정사
법학논총
2016 .10
-
산업재해보상보험법의 간병급여에 대한 논의
사회보장법연구
2024 .06
-
세제비적격 일반연금 대비 변액연금 계약자의 특징 분석
리스크 관리연구
2018 .01
-
정당한 보상으로서의 생활보상에 관한 비교법적 고찰
국가법연구
2017 .01
-
임신 중 여성 근로자의 장애아 등 출산에 대한 사회법적 보호 : 법원의 판결례와 국회 입법안을 중심으로
노동법논총
2018 .08
-
Development Experiences & Policy Challenges of Workers' Compensation Insurance Scheme in South Korea
한국비교정부학보
2015 .01
-
즉시연금보험 사건의 법적 쟁점 - 하급심판결의 검토를 중심으로 -
기업법연구
2021 .09
-
유족연금의 일실이익성에 대한 소고
사회보장법연구
2021 .12
-
공익사업에서 생활대책의 개념, 법적 성질, 쟁송방법
공법연구
2023 .10
-
공공기관의 보상 현황과 개선방향
한국경영과학회지
2015 .02
-
플랫폼 노동 종사자의 산업재해보상보험제도 적용방안
사회보장법연구
2021 .12
-
플랫폼노동으로의 전환과 프레카리아트화 - 근거이론 적용 -
노동연구
2024 .06
-
행정상 손실보상에 관한 헌법적 조망
인권과 정의
2019 .01
-
산재보험법 및 고용보험법의 사각지대
노동법학
2023 .06
-
산업재해보상보험법상 출･퇴근 중 재해 사건에서 헌법재판소 견해 평가 - 헌재 2016. 9. 29. 2014헌바254를 분석하며 -
법과정책
2017 .01
-
정당보상의 해석에 관한 연구
감정평가학논집
2020 .01
-
논문정정: 제도적 상보성 개념을 통한 산재보험법상 특례제도의 변화에 관한 연구
한국사회복지학
2025 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-360-001169196