지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국사연구회 한국사연구 韓國史硏究 제199집
- 발행연도
- 2022.12
- 수록면
- 53 - 91 (39page)
- DOI
- 10.31791/JKH.2022.12.199.53
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As far as Later-Goguryeo and Gungye are concerned, there is no literature data beyond the scope of information in Samguk-sagi. The biography of Gungye goes beyond a personal biography and is also the history of the Later-Goguryeo dynasty. Therefore, anyone interested in the history of Gungye and Later-Goguryeo analyzes the records of Gungye’s Biography and restores their history by giving meaning to them. If so, the family and birth-related records at the beginning of Gungye’s Biography are also a kind of gateway to the restoration of Later-Goguryeo history.
First, previous studies that have accessed this information were checked. As a result, it was confirmed that there were two trends. One view was to solve a problem within the range of information conveyed by the historical material, and the other was to find a solution outside the scope of the historical material. Under the great premise that Gungye is son of the Silla king, the former is view of choosing the father of Gung-ye among King Heonan or King Gyeongmun. The latter does not agree with the fact that Gungye is from the royal family of Silla, in connection with the integrity and artificiality of the subsequent birth-related records.
Leaving aside the controversial part, we first focused on the issue of ‘information itself’. It would have been difficult for the compilers of Samguk-sagi to identify either King Heonan or King Gyeongmun through the data they obtained. In the end, the conflicting family information of Gungye should be viewed as continuing to the Samguk-sagi without any confusion that occurred before the Samguk-sagi. In particular, the main focus of the evaluation of Gungye was on criticizing Gungye for betraying ‘own country’[宗國], Silla. Accordingly, I think the editors noted that Gungye was from the Silla’s royal family. Goryeo was founded after overthrowing Later-Goguryeo and Wanggeon was a servant of Gungye, so there were some flaws in the legitimacy of establishing the government. Therefore, rather than clarifying the historical facts of the previous dynasty, Therefore, rather than clarifying the historical facts of the previous dynasty, the focus was on emphasizing the reason why Gungye should be expelled, so it was considered that the information that was involved in the Samguk-Sagi continued without any inspection. In other words, there was no special opportunity to resolve Gungye’s family problem.
Next, attention was paid to ‘White Rainbow’[白虹] as a natural phenomenon contained in the birth-related information. As a result, we found out that the old notion that the appearance of a ‘白虹’ symbolized an ‘ominous sign’[咎徵] was also widely known to Silla, who enjoyed the 9th and 10th centuries. It is currently not possible to determine whether that natural phenomenon on the day Gungye was born is fiction. However, I would like to suggest that it is necessary to pay attention to the way of thinking at the time, the process of forming information, and the internal logic, which has been calling for the need to eliminate Gungye by mobilizing the ‘white rainbow’ as an ‘ominous sign’ since ancient times. In this context, it is regarded as a historical fact that Gungye was the prince of Silla.
First, previous studies that have accessed this information were checked. As a result, it was confirmed that there were two trends. One view was to solve a problem within the range of information conveyed by the historical material, and the other was to find a solution outside the scope of the historical material. Under the great premise that Gungye is son of the Silla king, the former is view of choosing the father of Gung-ye among King Heonan or King Gyeongmun. The latter does not agree with the fact that Gungye is from the royal family of Silla, in connection with the integrity and artificiality of the subsequent birth-related records.
Leaving aside the controversial part, we first focused on the issue of ‘information itself’. It would have been difficult for the compilers of Samguk-sagi to identify either King Heonan or King Gyeongmun through the data they obtained. In the end, the conflicting family information of Gungye should be viewed as continuing to the Samguk-sagi without any confusion that occurred before the Samguk-sagi. In particular, the main focus of the evaluation of Gungye was on criticizing Gungye for betraying ‘own country’[宗國], Silla. Accordingly, I think the editors noted that Gungye was from the Silla’s royal family. Goryeo was founded after overthrowing Later-Goguryeo and Wanggeon was a servant of Gungye, so there were some flaws in the legitimacy of establishing the government. Therefore, rather than clarifying the historical facts of the previous dynasty, Therefore, rather than clarifying the historical facts of the previous dynasty, the focus was on emphasizing the reason why Gungye should be expelled, so it was considered that the information that was involved in the Samguk-Sagi continued without any inspection. In other words, there was no special opportunity to resolve Gungye’s family problem.
Next, attention was paid to ‘White Rainbow’[白虹] as a natural phenomenon contained in the birth-related information. As a result, we found out that the old notion that the appearance of a ‘白虹’ symbolized an ‘ominous sign’[咎徵] was also widely known to Silla, who enjoyed the 9th and 10th centuries. It is currently not possible to determine whether that natural phenomenon on the day Gungye was born is fiction. However, I would like to suggest that it is necessary to pay attention to the way of thinking at the time, the process of forming information, and the internal logic, which has been calling for the need to eliminate Gungye by mobilizing the ‘white rainbow’ as an ‘ominous sign’ since ancient times. In this context, it is regarded as a historical fact that Gungye was the prince of Silla.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 기존의 연구 성과 검토
Ⅲ. 정보의 형성 과정 탐색
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중고기 新羅帶冠의 쇠퇴양상과 신라정치
신라사학보
2023 .12
-
상처받은 신라 : 이종욱, ≪상처받은 신라－그 안에 한국인 정체성의 원점이 있다≫, 서강대학교 출판부, 2016
신라사학보
2018 .12
-
서정주의 새 자료 「해동사화초」 연구
국어국문학
2022 .09
-
6~7세기 신라의 전략ㆍ전술 입안과 활용
한국사연구
2015 .06
-
최치원의 사행과 재입당 시점 재고 - ｢旅遊唐城贈先王樂官｣의 분석을 중심으로-
사학연구
2021 .09
-
고려 지배층의 신라 출자의식과 그 사회적 성격
역사와현실
2019 .06
-
신라 하대의 경제적 양극화와 재해
신라사학보
2020 .04
-
신라 중대 정치사 연구의 오랜 천착과 결실 : 이영호, 『신라 중대의 정치와 권력구조』(지식산업사, 2014)
한국고대사연구
2015 .12
-
신라 사상사 연구의 수렴과 확장 : (김복순, 2016, 『신라 사상사 연구』, 景仁文化社)
한국사학보
2019 .08
-
8세기 신라의 대일외교와 동아시아 인식
日本學硏究
2015 .01
-
670년대 신라와 당의 대립과 소통 - 薛仁貴⋅文武王書狀의 분석을 중심으로 -
영남학
2023 .06
-
新羅 五廟制 受容의 意味
한국고대사연구
2020 .03
-
신라 하대 唐 국자감의 신라 유학생 증가 배경과 유학의 경제적 여건
역사교육
2018 .06
-
불교미술 분포를 통해 본 신라문화권의 북방한계
신라사학보
2019 .08
-
8세기 신라의 遣唐使와 遣日使 비교 연구
한국고대사연구
2022 .06
-
Introduction: Yogācāra Studies of Silla
Journal of Korean Religions
2020 .01
-
5세기 중후반 신라의 소백산맥 이서 지역 진출
전북사학
2019 .01
-
나제동맹기 신라의 영역확장과 대백제관계
신라사학보
2024 .08
-
신라 禮部의 구성과 그 특성 -屬司의 관계와 직무를 중심으로-
역사교육논집
2024 .02
-
신라 국가제의와 관련된 종합적 자료 분석 및 재검토 –조상제사의 제장 변화를 중심으로
동양학
2024 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0