메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이슬 (홍익대학교) 이현성 (홍익대학교) 최익서 (홍익대학교)
저널정보
한국공간디자인학회 한국공간디자인학회 논문집 한국공간디자인학회 논문집 제16권 제6호
발행연도
2021.9
수록면
107 - 118 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
(Background and Purpose) Virtual exhibitions have emerged due to various factors including the concept and scope of the exhibition, the integration of technology and exhibition, and the coronavirus. Virtual exhibitions can be implemented in various and complex technologies such as HCI (Interaction between humans and computers), network technology, and directing using audiovisual information, and can be easily accessed by anyone. However, the limitations of VR and AR exhibitions are also pointed out. This study targets a 360-degree image based virtual exhibition that recreates the actual exhibition space into virtual reality and finds out what the immersion elements are in the user experience on the 2D graphics screen. (Method) The study was conducted in five stages. First, the user experience elements of the virtual exhibition were extracted through theoretical consideration. Five dimensions of Csiksentmihalyi's flow were adopted. Experience factors were divided into physical and non-physical factors. Second, User evaluation items were designed based on theoretical consideration. Third, Five cases were selected, and surveys and in-depth interviews were conducted for users. Fourth, the user experience evaluation results were analyzed. Fifth, a conclusion was reached by finding complementary points to improve the immersion of virtual exhibitions. (Results) The experience factors that make users feel immediate feedback are 'operating tools', which is highly related to 'dynamicity'. Factors that interfere with the dynamics of operating tools are 'different operating tools on different platforms', 'lack of accuracy'. The experience factor that makes behavior and awareness feel integrated is the 'Floor Guide', which is highly related to 'action-induced'. Some of the obstacles to user behavior are 'auto-rotation', 'auto-screen magnification'. The experience factors that increases concentration is "media," and has a high relationship with 'interest'. Factors that dampen interest in the media are 'low clarity' and 'low deployment level'. Experience factors that make users feel controlled are 'thumbnail maps', which are highly related to 'recognition'. Factors that hindered the recognition of thumbnail maps are 'unnecessary images', 'lack of function'. 47.9% of users responded that there was no experience factor that made them feel completely immersed, with an average of 2.31 points for immersion and an average of 2.48 points for satisfaction. (Conclusions) Considering that the majority of users evaluated the degree of immersion low, the current virtual exhibition platform needs to improve immersion. It needs unification of manipulation tools for immediate feedback enhancement, supplementation of floor guides' accuracy and movement functions, improvement of distortion and media implementation according to viewing angles to improve concentration, simplifying images and specifying functions of thumbnail maps to implement media and improve potential control. Virtual exhibition should consider the most common 2D display environment to ensure publicity and popularity, and will require steady research and development from a user experience perspective.
#Virtual Exhibition #Virtual Reality #Online Exhibition Platform #Immersion Environment #User Experience

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청
Bevan, N. / 2008 / UX, usability and ISO standards / CHI 2008 Workshop on user experience evaluation methods in product development :1~5 google schola Chen, H. / 2000 / Exploring web users’optimal flow experiences / Information Technology & People :263~281 google schola 조명은 / 2013 / 사용자 경험 증진을 위한 과학관 전시물의 사용성 평가 / 한국실내디자인학회 논문집 22(5):302~310 dbpia 정승진 / 2020 / 국내 가상체험전시의 사용자경험 분석 / 기초조형학연구 21(3):329~340 Crossref Csikszentmihalyi, M. / 1990 / Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience / Harrer & Row google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0