지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2023.6
- 수록면
- 608 - 619 (12page)
- DOI
- 10.14245/ns.2346274.137
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Objective: We aim to report the outcomes and feasibility of endoscopic spine surgery used to treat symptomatic spinal metastases patients. This is the most extensive series of spinal metastases patients who underwent endoscopic spine surgery.
Methods: A worldwide collaborative network group of endoscopic spine surgeons, named ‘ESSSORG,’ was established. Patients diagnosed with spinal metastases who underwent en doscopic spine surgery from 2012 to 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. All related patient data and clinical outcomes were gathered and analyzed before the surgery and the follow time period of 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months.
Results: A total of 29 patients from South Korea, Thailand, Taiwan, Mexico, Brazil, Ar gentina, Chile, and India, were included. The mean age was 59.59 years, and 11 of them were female. The total number of decompressed levels was 40. The technique was relatively equal (15 uniportal; 14 biportal). The average length of admission was 4.41 days. Of all pa tients with an American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale of D or lower before surgery, 62.06% reported having at least one recovery grade after the surgery. Almost all clinical outcomes parameters statistically significantly improved and maintained from 2 weeks to 6 months after the surgery. Few surgical-related complications (4 cases) were reported.
Conclusion: Endoscopic spine surgery is a valid option for treating spinal metastases pa tients as it could yield comparable results to other minimally invasive spine surgery tech niques. As the aim is to improve the quality of life, this procedure is valuable and holds val ue in palliative oncologic spine surgery.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Commentary on “The Role and Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic Spine Surgery of Treating Spinal Metastases; Outcomes of 29 Cases From 8 Countries”
Neurospine
2023 .06
-
Why Endoscopic Spine Surgery?
Neurospine
2023 .03
-
Evolution of Spinal Endoscopic Surgery
Neurospine
2019 .01
-
Why Should We Perform Endoscopic Spine Surgery?
Neurospine
2020 .01
-
A Narrative Review of Development of Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Spine Surgery
Neurospine
2020 .01
-
Introduction to Endoscopic Spinal Surgery
Neurospine
2020 .01
-
Endoscopic Lumbar Surgery: The State of the Art in 2019
Neurospine
2019 .01
-
노인성 척추질환의 수술적 치료
대한의사협회지
2021 .01
-
Strategies for Globalizing Endoscopic Spine Surgery
Neurospine
2023 .03
-
The Future of Spine Surgery in the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Telerobotic Spine Surgery
Neurospine
2020 .01
-
Impact of Multidisciplinary Spine Conferences on Surgical Planning and Perioperative Care in Elective Lumbar Spine Surgeries
Asian Spine Journal
2018 .01
-
Clinical Characteristics, Surgical Outcomes, and Risk Factors for Emergency Surgery in Patients With Spinal Metastases: A Prospective Cohort Study
Neurospine
2024 .03
-
Surgery
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2017 .11
-
Surgery
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2016 .11
-
Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: Techniques, Technologies, and Indications
Asian Spine Journal
2020 .01
-
Current Indications for Spinal Endoscopic Surgery and Potential for Future Expansion
Neurospine
2023 .03
-
The Role and Future of Endoscopic Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review
Neurospine
2023 .03
-
Robot-Assisted Spine Surgery: A Solution for Aging Spine Surgeons
Neurospine
2018 .01
-
A 30-Year Worldwide Research Productivity of Scientific Publication in Full-Endoscopic Decompression Spine Surgery: Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis
Neurospine
2023 .03
-
Commentary on “Complications and Management of Endoscopic Spinal Surgery”
Neurospine
2023 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0