지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2023.11
- 수록면
- 372 - 379 (8page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Backgrounds/Aims: While single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) has advantages in cosmesis and postoperative pain, its utilization has been limited. This study raises the possibility of expanding its indication to acute cholecystitis with the novel method of solo surgery under retrospective analysis.
Methods: We compared the outcomes of SILC (n = 58) to those of three-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TILC; n = 117) for acute cholecystitis, being performed from March 2014 to December 2015.
Results: Intraoperative results, including the operation time, did not differ significantly, except for drain catheter insertion (p = 0.004). Each group had 1 case of open conversion due to common bile duct injury. There was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay. Either group by itself was not a risk factor for complications, but in preoperative drainage for intraoperative perforation, 3 factors of intraoperative perforation, biliary complication, and history of upper abdominal operation for additional port, only American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores for postoperative complication of Clavien–Dindo grades III and IV were significant risk factors.
Conclusions: Our study findings showed comparative outcomes between both groups, providing evidence for the safety and feasibility of SILC for acute cholecystitis.
Methods: We compared the outcomes of SILC (n = 58) to those of three-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TILC; n = 117) for acute cholecystitis, being performed from March 2014 to December 2015.
Results: Intraoperative results, including the operation time, did not differ significantly, except for drain catheter insertion (p = 0.004). Each group had 1 case of open conversion due to common bile duct injury. There was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay. Either group by itself was not a risk factor for complications, but in preoperative drainage for intraoperative perforation, 3 factors of intraoperative perforation, biliary complication, and history of upper abdominal operation for additional port, only American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores for postoperative complication of Clavien–Dindo grades III and IV were significant risk factors.
Conclusions: Our study findings showed comparative outcomes between both groups, providing evidence for the safety and feasibility of SILC for acute cholecystitis.
목차
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Impact of advanced age on surgical outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2022 .12
-
A large-cohort comparison between single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy from a single center; 2080 cases
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2018 .11
-
Comparison of Single Incision and Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis according to the Severity
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .05
-
Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with Mirizzi syndrome
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2018 .02
-
Comparison of outcomes of single incision robotic cholecystectomy and single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .02
-
Comparison between percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage and upfront laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with moderate-to-severe acute cholecystitis: a propensity score-matched analysis
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2023 .11
-
Drain management following difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: A propensity matched comparative study
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2022 .12
-
Know-how of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2016 .11
-
Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients after preoperative assessment and optimization of comorbidities
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2018 .11
-
Risk factors for conversion to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2016 .05
-
A retrospective single-center study comparing clinical outcomes of 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2019 .11
-
Acute cholecystitis in pregnant women: A therapeutic challenge in a developing country center
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2023 .11
-
4-channel single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is superior to 3-channel SILC
한국간담췌외과학회 학술대회지
2016 .04
-
Early complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .12
-
In Octogenerian, Clinical Outcomes According to Preoperative Severity of Disease and Comorbidity for Acute Cholecystitis Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2018 .11
-
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using instrumental alignment in robotic single-site cholecystectomy
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2018 .06
-
Safety for using fluorescent cholangiography in robotic single incision cholecystectomy in both acute and chronic cholecystitis
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2022 .12
-
Comparison of Single-Incision Robotic Cholecystectomy versus conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a single Center
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2023 .05
-
Current status of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Korea - Multicenter study
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2019 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-088242491