지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
With the advent of the TRIPS Agreement, international disputes about governmental regulation of intellectual property rights are now subject to adjudication within WTO dispute settlement mechanism. The focus of this paper on TRIPS Agreement begs the larger question of whether the WTO mechanism to settle trade disputes between nations takes sufficient account of so-called "public domain" of TRIPS Agreement in general. The question of how to promote and institutionalize global public domain affirms in a world of sovereign states with divergent norms and preferences, reflecting differences in economic development levels, increasingly confronts the international policy agenda. It raises issues not only for political decision-making but also for judicial interpretation of existing international agreements. The study begins with delineating characteristics and conflicts of TRIPS Agreement taking into backgrounds the UR negotiation and it also distinguishes application of GATT dispute mechanism to the TRIPS Agreement comparing the past GATT with the newly-designed WTO system. This study examines the nature, not only of the WTO as an institution, but of WTO obligation. It posits that WTO obligations remain mixed with a bilateral contract nature and a collective or consitutional type and offers how the TRIPS public domain have fared in the WTO dispute settlement process. The paper wraps up the suggestions on how the WTO system could be improved to give more prominence to public domain of intellectual property rights.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-089342749