메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Bae Seowoo (National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.Department of Health Convergence, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.) Lee Kyeongmin (Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.) Kim Byung Chang (Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.) Jun Jae Kwan (National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.) Choi Kui Son (National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.) Suh Mina (National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.)
저널정보
대한의학회 Journal of Korean Medical Science Journal of Korean Medical Science Vol.39 No.10
발행연도
2024.3
수록면
1 - 14 (14page)
DOI
10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e98

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background: This study aimed to identify the most cost-effective strategy for colorectal cancer screening using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT), focusing on screening initiation age in Korea. Methods: We designed Markov simulation models targeting individuals aged 40 years or older. Twelve strategies combining screening initiation ages (40, 45, or 50 years old), termination ages (80 or no limit), and intervals (1 or 2 years) were modeled, and the most cost-effective strategy was selected. The robustness of the results was confirmed using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Furthermore, the cost-effectiveness of the qualitative and quantitative FIT methods was verified using scenario analysis. Results: The 2-year interval strategy with a screening age range of 45–80 years was the most cost-effective (incremental cost-utility ratio = KRW 7,281,646/quality adjusted life years). The most sensitive variables in the results were transition rate from advanced adenoma to local cancer and discount rate. The uncertainty in the model was substantially low. Moreover, strategies starting at the age of 40 years were also cost-effective but considered suboptimal. The scenario analysis showed that there was no significant difference in cost-effectiveness between strategies with various relative screening ratio of quantitative and qualitative method. Conclusion: The screening method for advancing the initiation age, as presented in the 2015 revised national screening recommendations, was superior regarding cost-effectiveness. This study provides a new paradigm for the development of a national cancer screening system in Korea, which can be utilized as a scientific basis for economic evaluations.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0