지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第168輯
- 발행연도
- 2024.9
- 수록면
- 145 - 196 (52page)
- DOI
- 10.17856/jahs.2024.9.168.145
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article aims to reconsider the conventional ways of representing mass communication and power during the Asia-Pacific War (1931-1945) in contemporary Japanese historiography by challenging the limiting recurrent epistemological premises that dominate the scholarly discourse. This is a preliminary effort to explore alternative perspectives and methodologies that will enhance research on the social and cultural dimensions of media communication during the war. Specifically, this article analyzes how postwar historiography has myopically interpreted the wartime practices of radio broadcasting—a medium often regarded as emblematic of a centralized, top-down mode of wartime communication—and how this interpretation has been perpetuated throughout the “long postwar” (nagai sengo) period.
Conventional postwar historiography has framed wartime media communication and power primarily through the lens of oppression and propaganda. Despite significant criticism, the constant repetition of this limiting framework renders it increasingly imperative to investigate the primary factors that have contributed to its ongoing recurrence in contemporary scholarship. As such, this study proposes a reevaluation of the main assumptions that underlie the dominant postwar historiography of wartime Japan, particularly the liberal concept of power and media determinism, including the magic bullet theory.
First, this article will trace the consolidation of these assumptions during the war years and the early postwar period, a perspective which resulted from the collaboration between U.S. policymakers and Japanese political elites. Additionally, I will discuss specific examples that illustrate how recent studies on wartime radio broadcasting, while attempting to transcend conventional approaches by integrating developments informed by the concepts of total war systems and transwar history, ultimately revert to prior established orientations by inadvertently relying on longstanding conventional assumptions to frame their analyses. Lastly, I propose alternative ways of inquiry and provide examples of overlooked yet significant cases that will help historical research to move beyond the conventional paradigms and constructively reevaluate the notions of power and media communication in wartime Japan.
Conventional postwar historiography has framed wartime media communication and power primarily through the lens of oppression and propaganda. Despite significant criticism, the constant repetition of this limiting framework renders it increasingly imperative to investigate the primary factors that have contributed to its ongoing recurrence in contemporary scholarship. As such, this study proposes a reevaluation of the main assumptions that underlie the dominant postwar historiography of wartime Japan, particularly the liberal concept of power and media determinism, including the magic bullet theory.
First, this article will trace the consolidation of these assumptions during the war years and the early postwar period, a perspective which resulted from the collaboration between U.S. policymakers and Japanese political elites. Additionally, I will discuss specific examples that illustrate how recent studies on wartime radio broadcasting, while attempting to transcend conventional approaches by integrating developments informed by the concepts of total war systems and transwar history, ultimately revert to prior established orientations by inadvertently relying on longstanding conventional assumptions to frame their analyses. Lastly, I propose alternative ways of inquiry and provide examples of overlooked yet significant cases that will help historical research to move beyond the conventional paradigms and constructively reevaluate the notions of power and media communication in wartime Japan.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제 제기: 전시 일본의 미디어 커뮤니케이션과 전후 일본의 역사서술
Ⅱ. 전후의 전시 역사서술의 지배적인 권력관과 미디어관
Ⅲ. 현대 일본의 전시 라디오방송 연구와 재귀하는 전후 역사서술
Ⅳ. 결론을 대신하여: 전시 일본의 미디어 사회문화사 연구의 심화를 위하여
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
주체 사관에서 인민과 민족의 자리
역사비평
2022 .08
-
민족/국민국가, 제국, 역사학 — 왕후이(汪暉)의 『아시아는 세계다』를 중심으로 —
중국근현대사연구
2023 .09
-
식민사관 비판론의 등장과 내재적 발전론의 형성
사학연구
2017 .03
-
Two Memories, Two Historiographies
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2019 .06
-
『임나흥망사』를 통해 본 스에마츠 야스카즈의 역사관
역사비평
2020 .08
-
Politics of Asian Orientalism: Representation of Asian Migrant Others in Korean TV Shows
동서비교문학저널
2023 .06
-
라디오의 정치: 1960년대 박정희 정부의 ‘농어촌 라디오 보내기 운동’
한국과학사학회지
2016 .12
-
Relief Activities in Postwar Japan
대한일어일문학회 학술대회 발표논문 요지집
2016 .04
-
실증사학의 ‘이념’ — 식민지 조선에 온 역사주의
인문논총
2019 .01
-
아시아 태평양전쟁과 라디오 방송 - 다자이오사무 문학 속 라디오 표상 연구 -
일본어문학
2016 .01
-
제국일본의 방송법에 관한 인식론적 고찰
日本思想
2018 .01
-
“To Capture Minds and Wills”: Establishing Christian Radio Broadcasting in Cold War South Korea
Korea Journal
2020 .12
-
『사진과 그림으로 보는 전시 일본의 프로파간다』 자료의 가치와 한계
동북아역사논총
2022 .09
-
오래된 미래: 미중 냉전과 인도-태평양의 형성
역사학보
2022 .03
-
論經說義 敘事解經一一以夏姬之人物敘事 論《左傳》之解經模式
국제언어문학
2020 .04
-
로마의 “역사(historia)” 활용 방식에 대하여
역사교육
2019 .03
-
언제나 마무리되는 이야기, 끝나지 않는 역사: Ever After
현대영미소설
2015 .01
-
The “Civil War Thesis” and the Myth of Revisionism in the Historiography of the Korean War: A Critical Review of Recent (Post-Cumings) Scholarly Literature
Korea Journal
2022 .12
-
나치 시기 라디오 수용 통제 전략, 1933-1939-라디오 프로그램 잡지 『나치 라디오』, 『민족 라디오』, 『삽화로 보는 독일 라디오』를 중심으로-
서양사론
2020 .01
-
전쟁과 세대론 -구로사와 아키라(黒澤明)의 전전과 전후-
일어일문학연구
2018 .01
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0