지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article deals with the legal protection of franchisees in franchise contracts A franchise business is formed with a franchise contract between a franchiser and a franchisee, but the contract is usually made when the franchisee is in a disadvantageous economic and legal situation. Commonly, such a contract is one-sidedly advantageous to the franchiser and unfairly limits the franchisee's business.
To protect the franchisee, it is important to improve the legal interpretation and application of the franchise contract. In this article, I explain the meaning and bases of the Franchise Disclosure Rule, and interpret positive Korean franchise contract law. I scrutinize the Korean regulations regarding franchise contract offer obligations with reference to cases in America, Canada, Japan and UNlDROT. Further, I support the view that to ensure that fair franchise contracts are made between franchisers and franchisees, general information about franchisers has to be open to public scrutiny.
The Korean Franchise Disclosure Rule is especially focused on. Specifically, the article analyzes the duty to disclose information, and provides examples about disclosure, exemptions from the disclosure requirement, and the rescission of the franchise contracts for misrepresentation.
The solutions to the problems of the current information franchise contract disclosure system are presented as follows. First, the contents of franchise contracts which are prescribed in information disclosure documents should be defined clearly so that there is no possibility of arbitrary interpretation. Second, in the application of information disclosures, procedural paperwork has to be reduced or abolished so that the information disclosure system can be applied effectively Third, the cooling off period for franchisees has to be extended 10 to 14 days Fourth, the location of the headquarters of franchises and the numbers of franchisees who have cancelled their contractshave to be disclosed to substantially protect prospective franchisees from false or exaggerated advertisements.
To protect the franchisee, it is important to improve the legal interpretation and application of the franchise contract. In this article, I explain the meaning and bases of the Franchise Disclosure Rule, and interpret positive Korean franchise contract law. I scrutinize the Korean regulations regarding franchise contract offer obligations with reference to cases in America, Canada, Japan and UNlDROT. Further, I support the view that to ensure that fair franchise contracts are made between franchisers and franchisees, general information about franchisers has to be open to public scrutiny.
The Korean Franchise Disclosure Rule is especially focused on. Specifically, the article analyzes the duty to disclose information, and provides examples about disclosure, exemptions from the disclosure requirement, and the rescission of the franchise contracts for misrepresentation.
The solutions to the problems of the current information franchise contract disclosure system are presented as follows. First, the contents of franchise contracts which are prescribed in information disclosure documents should be defined clearly so that there is no possibility of arbitrary interpretation. Second, in the application of information disclosures, procedural paperwork has to be reduced or abolished so that the information disclosure system can be applied effectively Third, the cooling off period for franchisees has to be extended 10 to 14 days Fourth, the location of the headquarters of franchises and the numbers of franchisees who have cancelled their contractshave to be disclosed to substantially protect prospective franchisees from false or exaggerated advertisements.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 가맹계약체결과 정보제공의 필요성
Ⅲ. 정보공개제도의 개념과 외국의 입법례
Ⅳ. 가맹사업법에서의 정보제공의무
Ⅴ. 결론
♣ 참고문헌
참고문헌 (19)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
加盟事業去來에서의 情報公開制度
법학연구
2003 .06
-
가맹사업법의 최근 쟁점과 개선방안
경쟁법연구
2018 .01
-
프랜차이즈 가맹본부의 경영전략: 정보공개서 자료 분석을 중심으로
기업경영연구
2015 .01
-
개정 가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률의 주요쟁점 및 문제점
재산법연구
2008 .01
-
동북아 경제중심 국가에 따른 프랜차이즈 (가맹사업) 법제 정비 방향
경영법률
2012 .01
-
일본의 프랜차이즈 계약에 관한 법적 규제 : 독점금지법을 중심으로
한양법학
2010 .02
-
외식 프랜차이지의 가맹 계약 법률 인식에 관한 연구
Culinary Science & Hospitality Research
2006 .12
-
외식 프랜차이즈산업의 가맹점 만족도에 관한 연구
Culinary Science & Hospitality Research
2000 .09
-
中國에 있어서 프랜차이즈에 대한 法規制의 現況과 改善方向
경영법률
2010 .01
-
외식 프랜차이즈 창업자 환경이 가맹 본부 조건과 신뢰,계약 의사에 관한 연구
Culinary Science & Hospitality Research
2010 .01
-
가맹사업 공정화를 위한 지역정책 연구
정책연구
2016 .10
-
가맹금의 개념과 정의조항
고려법학
2010 .01
-
외식프랜차이즈의 가맹점교육이 경영성과에 미치는 영향
한국외식산업학회지
2013 .12
-
프랜차이즈의 국제화와 가맹사업법의 문제점
경영법률
2008 .01
-
How to Resolve Disputes between Franchise Headquarters and Franchisee (through Case Study)
Culinary Science & Hospitality Research
2020 .09
-
외식 프랜차이즈 선택동기가 재계약에 미치는 영향
호텔관광연구
2005 .09
-
가맹본부의 지원제도가 본부에 대한 태도 및 가맹점의 재무성과에 미치는 영향: 지역상권 경쟁강도의 조절효과를 중심으로
유통과학연구
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-366-014440204