개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
With the official seal, the declarations of issuer on the official documents was the most remarkable property that distinguishes official documents from private ones. The declarations of issuer on official documents consisted of 'the office-marking'(着官; a marking of office by the officer or government office) representing that the official duty of government officer was responsible for the contents of the document and had the competence to come into effect, and 'the signature'(押) of the officer in charge of the duty. As the 'the office-marking' on the official documents particularly represented that the officer issued the document on his competence from official duty, on no private one, they should be clearly distinguished from the declarations of issuer on private documents just to express his position. 'The office-marking' primarily had a function to represent who the issuer was and that the document was examined by the officer as needed from the documentary administrations with the signature. For this reason, the official document had completed its form only when had the office-markings and the signatures, and then it could become effective. Therefore, we can regard the office-marking and the signature as the important part on the documents, for they came into effect of the official documents.
In this paper, as the beginning of study on the office-marking, I tried to analyze the aspect to record the marking of office on the documents issued by the Gyeongjubu(慶州府) adopting the documents of Dokrakdang as the principal material. The markings of major(尹) in Gyeongjubu(府) were represented correctly '府尹' or ‘尹’ without ‘府’, but were not found ‘官’ like on the documents issued by the 'gun'(ttl)) or 'hyeon'(縣). The major who wrote the signature marked the office, or the officer in charge who was entrusted from the major of Gyeongjubu marked the office before got the signature of major. Through that, I could realize that the marker of office was different with the characteristics of each document and the process to make out it.
On the other hand, it was most remarkable that the documents issued by Gyeongjubu had the marking of office written by the 'pangwan'(判官) together with the major's. By the early in seventeen century the office-markings, only found on the official documents of special administrative districts like Gyeongjubu, were wrote relatively correctly, but after then its form had gotten simple and the number of lines had not been kept well. Nevertheless, the pangwans in Gyeongjubu surely wrote the office-markings on the form, therefore we could see that on the documents in Gyeongjubu the office-markings written by pangwans had remained by 1671 when the government abolished the organization of pangwan. I think that the signature of pangwans was important on the form along with the office-markings but not necessary, for example, on the official documents in Gyeongjubu no signature of pangwans was not found.
In this paper, studying only the official documents in Kyeongjubu, I wrote briefly about the form of office-markings on the official documents issued by such administrative districts as bu(府)ㆍmok(牧)ㆍgun(郡)ㆍhyeon(縣), and I'm afraid I could not include all kinds of official documents in the subject of my studies. I will complement this weak point in next study.
In this paper, as the beginning of study on the office-marking, I tried to analyze the aspect to record the marking of office on the documents issued by the Gyeongjubu(慶州府) adopting the documents of Dokrakdang as the principal material. The markings of major(尹) in Gyeongjubu(府) were represented correctly '府尹' or ‘尹’ without ‘府’, but were not found ‘官’ like on the documents issued by the 'gun'(ttl)) or 'hyeon'(縣). The major who wrote the signature marked the office, or the officer in charge who was entrusted from the major of Gyeongjubu marked the office before got the signature of major. Through that, I could realize that the marker of office was different with the characteristics of each document and the process to make out it.
On the other hand, it was most remarkable that the documents issued by Gyeongjubu had the marking of office written by the 'pangwan'(判官) together with the major's. By the early in seventeen century the office-markings, only found on the official documents of special administrative districts like Gyeongjubu, were wrote relatively correctly, but after then its form had gotten simple and the number of lines had not been kept well. Nevertheless, the pangwans in Gyeongjubu surely wrote the office-markings on the form, therefore we could see that on the documents in Gyeongjubu the office-markings written by pangwans had remained by 1671 when the government abolished the organization of pangwan. I think that the signature of pangwans was important on the form along with the office-markings but not necessary, for example, on the official documents in Gyeongjubu no signature of pangwans was not found.
In this paper, studying only the official documents in Kyeongjubu, I wrote briefly about the form of office-markings on the official documents issued by such administrative districts as bu(府)ㆍmok(牧)ㆍgun(郡)ㆍhyeon(縣), and I'm afraid I could not include all kinds of official documents in the subject of my studies. I will complement this weak point in next study.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 지방 관문서의 着官 양상
3. 경주부윤의 着官 형태
4. 경주부 判官의 着官
6. 맺음말
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
19세기 경주부의 재정운영과 임술민란
역사와 담론
2013 .01
-
Subject and Object Markings in Conversational Korean
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2008 .11
-
Out of Office
Korea Journal
1977 .01
-
고려시대 공문서의 전달체계와 지방행정운영
한국사연구
2003 .09
-
14-15세기 고문서 자료에 나타난 지방행정체계- ‘陳省’의 발급과 송부체계를 중심으로 -
古文書硏究
2006 .01
-
고려시기 공문서 관리체계에서 胥吏의 地位
역사교육
2004 .03
-
Introgression of Sex-Limited Larval Markings to a Productive MultivoltineStrain of Silkworm Bombyx mori L.
International Journal of Industrial Entomology
2006 .01
-
簡帛으로 본 秦漢代의 鄕里文書
중국고중세사연구
2008 .08
-
朝鮮初期 官職構造硏究
대구사학
2004 .01
-
[논문] 고려 현종대 정치와 이계(吏系) 관료
역사와현실
2005 .03
-
청대(淸代) ‘지이술괴(志異述怪)’의 성행에 관한 고찰 ― 관서(官署)의 특성을 중심으로
중국학
2009 .01
-
근대 한중관계의 변화와 외교당안의 생성 : 「淸季駐韓使館保存檔」을 중심으로
중국근현대사연구
2011 .06
-
唐代 지방의 文書案과 官文書 작성 : 한국 고대 관문서의 시원에 대한 탐색
장서각
2011 .04
-
16～17세기 慶尙道 慈仁縣 復縣 과정과 이를 둘러싼 慈仁․慶州 지역 재지사족의 동향
古文書硏究
2012 .01
-
[총론] 고려전기 겸직제에 대한 탐구
역사와현실
2010 .06
-
울릉도쟁계의 조일 간 교환문서에 대한 논의의 재검토
독도연구
2019 .01
-
신라 中代 일반관청의 조직 구조와 原形
역사학보
2018 .12
-
고려시대의 관문서와 전달체계
古文書硏究
2008 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-151-001733501