지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
‘Public procurement contract’ means the contract which is concluded in the process of procuring goods, services and works between public agency and contractor. In Korea, these contracts are regulated mainly by ‘Act on the contract in which state is a party’(hereinafter ‘State Contract Act’). Recently, there are arguments for reform of this Act, which calls for the need to study and analyze reform of public procurement contract in European Union(EU).
In general, EU is making efforts to consider ‘public law element’ of public procurement law. First, EU's new public procurement directive adopted new contract type; namely “competitive dialogue”. In this contract type, public authorities have power of limiting the number of participants. However, EU directive provides measures to curb this power. Second, there are provisions related to transparency (which is one of the major principles in public law), such as information disclosure provision for the prevention of discrimination between participants. Third, EU directive acknowledges social or environmental considerations in public procurement by allowing these consideration as an award criteria. Fourth, EU guarantees fairness in public procurement by expanding cases of exclusion from bidding procedure. Considering these trends in EU, we can suggest the following reform tasks. First, we should be very careful in adopting this type of contract because ‘capture’ problem can be more serious in Korea. It is better for us to use and complement ‘negotiation procedure’. Second, e-procurement should be dealt in directly in ‘State Contract Act’ because of its importance in people's basic right. Although electronic auction is already introduced in Korea, it should be used very carefully considering industrial structure and contract culture of Korea. Third, ‘State Contract Act’ should provide more clearly that social or environmental considerations can be used as an award criteria. In its implementation, however, these considerations should be balanced with economic efficiency of public procurement itself. Fourth, we should abide by principle of proportionality in dealing with exclusion from bidding procedure.
In general, EU is making efforts to consider ‘public law element’ of public procurement law. First, EU's new public procurement directive adopted new contract type; namely “competitive dialogue”. In this contract type, public authorities have power of limiting the number of participants. However, EU directive provides measures to curb this power. Second, there are provisions related to transparency (which is one of the major principles in public law), such as information disclosure provision for the prevention of discrimination between participants. Third, EU directive acknowledges social or environmental considerations in public procurement by allowing these consideration as an award criteria. Fourth, EU guarantees fairness in public procurement by expanding cases of exclusion from bidding procedure. Considering these trends in EU, we can suggest the following reform tasks. First, we should be very careful in adopting this type of contract because ‘capture’ problem can be more serious in Korea. It is better for us to use and complement ‘negotiation procedure’. Second, e-procurement should be dealt in directly in ‘State Contract Act’ because of its importance in people's basic right. Although electronic auction is already introduced in Korea, it should be used very carefully considering industrial structure and contract culture of Korea. Third, ‘State Contract Act’ should provide more clearly that social or environmental considerations can be used as an award criteria. In its implementation, however, these considerations should be balanced with economic efficiency of public procurement itself. Fourth, we should abide by principle of proportionality in dealing with exclusion from bidding procedure.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 공공조달계약의 법적 성질
Ⅲ. 유럽연합 공공조달계약법제의 개혁
Ⅳ. 우리나라 국가계약법의 개혁
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
미국의 주(州) 및 지방정부 계약법제에 대한 연구
지방자치법연구
2018 .01
-
행정조달계약에 있어서 공익(公益)을 위한 계약의 변경 및 해지에 관한 연구
法學論文集
2017 .01
-
공법상 계약의 특수한 법적 규율
외법논집
2010 .01
-
인공지능 전문가 윤리의 역할과 윤리 기준의 지향점
법학논총
2020 .02
-
지방계약과 지방자치- 지방계약의 자치보장적 함의에 관하여 -
홍익법학
2018 .01
-
재정행정법과 국제경제법의 상관관계에서 본 정부조달계약
행정법연구
2007 .05
-
약관법과 민법의 관계, 계약내용통제 및 일부무효와 관련하여
외법논집
2010 .01
-
지방자치단체의 수의계약
행정법연구
2005 .10
-
INTERNATIONAL CONTRACT LAWS AND FORMATION OF CONTRACT
국제거래와 법
2011 .12
-
신종계약의 법적 규율
재산법연구
2019 .01
-
EU 신공공조달지침하에서의 독일 법제에 대한 비교연구 : 공법적 제도를 중심으로
경제규제와 법
2018 .05
-
중국ㆍ북한 민법상 계약일반과 그 성립
법학연구
2006 .02
-
국제계약에 있어서 계약언어의 선택과 효과
중재연구
2005 .01
-
행정기능의 민영화와 관련된 행정계약 : 민관협력계약과 민간위탁계약을 중심으로
행정법연구
2005 .10
-
미국 계약법상의 무효법리
재산법연구
2013 .01
-
전자무역계약의 가치와 전자무역 추진환경에 관한 고찰
무역학회지
2008 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-018449456